Abstract:Visual attentional selection is influenced by the value of objects. Previous studies have demonstrated that reward-associated items lead to rapid distraction and associated behavioral costs, which are difficult to override with top-down control. However, it has not been determined whether a perceptually competitive environment could render the reward-driven distraction more susceptible to top-down suppression. Here, we trained both genders of human subjects to associate two orientations with high and low magnitudes of reward. After training, we collected fMRI data while the subjects performed a categorical visual search task. The item in the reward-associated orientation served as the distractor, and the relative physical salience between the target and distractor was carefully controlled to modulate the degree of perceptual competition. The behavioral results showed faster searches in the presence of high, relative to low, reward-associated distractors. However, this effect was evident only if the physical salience of the distractor was higher than that of the target, indicating a context-dependent suppression effect of reward salience that relied on high perceptual competition. By analyzing the fMRI data in primary visual cortex, we found that the behavioral pattern of results could be predicted by the suppressed channel responses tuned to the reward-associated orientation in the distractor location, accompanied by increased responses in the midbrain dopaminergic region. Our results suggest that the learned salience of a reward plays a flexible role in solving perceptual competition, enabling the neural system to adaptively modulate the perceptual representation for behavioral optimization.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The predictiveness principle in learning theory suggests that the stimulus with high predictability of reward receives priority in attentional selection. This selection bias leads to difficulties in changing approach behaviors, and thus becomes an important factor related to psychiatric disorders with attentional deficits. Here, we demonstrated that such principle is adaptively implemented in attentional suppression in visual search. We showed that the learned salience induced the suppression of the reward-associated distractor if its competition with the target was strong and could not be readily solved. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased midbrain fMRI activity and weakened sensory representation of the reward-associated distractor in V1. Our findings provided direct evidence that our brain flexibly uses learned regularities in attentional control.

Reward expectation modulates N2pc for target selection: Electrophysiological evidence

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

The Effect of Modulating Top-Down Attention Deployment on the N2pc/PCN

Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search

Further Evidence That N2pc Reflects Target Enhancement Rather Than Distracter Suppression

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Reward History and Statistical Learning Independently Impact Attention Search: An ERP Study

Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations

Decoding Attention Control and Selection in Visual Spatial Attention

Independent Effects of Reward Expectation and Spatial Orientation on the Processing of Emotional Facial Expressions.

Reward Association Facilitates Distractor Suppression in Human Visual Search

Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation

Electrophysiological Evidence for Inhibition of Return Effect in Exogenous Orienting

Predicting N2pc from Anticipatory HbO Activity During Sustained Visuospatial Attention: A Concurrent Fnirs–erp Study

Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance

Human Electrophysiology Reveals Delayed but Enhanced Selection in Inhibition of Return.

Task Relevance Regulates the Interaction Between Reward Expectation and Emotion

Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict

The effect of performance contingent reward prospects flexibly adapts to more versus less specific task goals

Reward Breaks Through the Inhibitory Region Around Attentional Focus

Differential Modulations of Reward Expectation on Implicit Facial Emotion Processing: ERP Evidence.