Reward History and Statistical Learning Independently Impact Attention Search: An ERP Study

Guang Zhao,Rongtao Wu,Huijun Wang,Jiahuan Chen,Shiyi Li,Qiang Wang,Hong-Jin Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14090874
IF: 3.333
2024-09-01
Brain Sciences
Abstract:Selection history is widely accepted as a vital source in attention control. Reward history indicates that a learned association captures attention even when the reward is no longer presented, while statistical learning indicates that a learned probability exerts its influence on attentional control (facilitation or inhibition). Existing research has shown that the effects of the reward history and statistical learning are additive, suggesting that these two components influence attention priority through different pathways. In the current study, leveraging the temporal resolution advantages of EEG, we explored whether these two components represent independent sources of attentional bias. The results revealed faster responses to the target at the high-probability location compared to low-probability locations. Both the target and distractor at high-probability locations elicited larger early Pd (50–150 ms) and Pd (150–250 ms) components. The reward distractor slowed the target search and elicited a larger N2pc (180–350 ms). Further, no interaction between statistical learning and the reward history was observed in RTs or N2pc. The different types of temporal progression in attention control indicate that statistical learning and the reward history independently modulate the attention priority map.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?