Abstract:Visual attentional selection is influenced by the value of objects. Previous studies have demonstrated that reward-associated items lead to rapid distraction and associated behavioral costs, which are difficult to override with top-down control. However, it has not been determined whether a perceptually competitive environment could render the reward-driven distraction more susceptible to top-down suppression. Here, we trained both genders of human subjects to associate two orientations with high and low magnitudes of reward. After training, we collected fMRI data while the subjects performed a categorical visual search task. The item in the reward-associated orientation served as the distractor, and the relative physical salience between the target and distractor was carefully controlled to modulate the degree of perceptual competition. The behavioral results showed faster searches in the presence of high, relative to low, reward-associated distractors. However, this effect was evident only if the physical salience of the distractor was higher than that of the target, indicating a context-dependent suppression effect of reward salience that relied on high perceptual competition. By analyzing the fMRI data in primary visual cortex, we found that the behavioral pattern of results could be predicted by the suppressed channel responses tuned to the reward-associated orientation in the distractor location, accompanied by increased responses in the midbrain dopaminergic region. Our results suggest that the learned salience of a reward plays a flexible role in solving perceptual competition, enabling the neural system to adaptively modulate the perceptual representation for behavioral optimization.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The predictiveness principle in learning theory suggests that the stimulus with high predictability of reward receives priority in attentional selection. This selection bias leads to difficulties in changing approach behaviors, and thus becomes an important factor related to psychiatric disorders with attentional deficits. Here, we demonstrated that such principle is adaptively implemented in attentional suppression in visual search. We showed that the learned salience induced the suppression of the reward-associated distractor if its competition with the target was strong and could not be readily solved. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased midbrain fMRI activity and weakened sensory representation of the reward-associated distractor in V1. Our findings provided direct evidence that our brain flexibly uses learned regularities in attentional control.

Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.

Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance

Reward Enhances Backward Inhibition in Task Switching

Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control

Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing

Evaluative Distractors Modulate Attentional Disengagement: People Would Rather Stay Longer on Rewards.

Negative Emotion Interferes with Behavioral Inhibitory Control: an ERP Study

Anger and Selective Attention to Reward and Punishment in Children

Reward Association Facilitates Distractor Suppression in Human Visual Search

Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions

Losing Control in Front of a Fearful Face: the Effect of Emotional Information on Cognitive Control

Stimuli with a positive valence can facilitate cognitive control

Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation

Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance

Differential Modulations of Reward Expectation on Implicit Facial Emotion Processing: ERP Evidence.

Reward Expectation Modulates Multiple Stages of Auditory Conflict Control.

Dissociable Effects of Fear and Disgust in Proactive and Reactive Inhibition

Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivational states

Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.

Reward Improves Cognitive Control by Enhancing Signal Monitoring

Positive emotion modulates cognitive control: an event-related potentials study.