Abstract:The motivational dimensional model of affect, proposed by Gable and Harmon-Jones (2010), posits that approach motivational intensity of positive affect modulates the influence of positive affect on cognition. In line with this model, accumulating evidences have supported this hypothesis. Studies have found that low approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., serenity) broadens, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., desire) narrows cognitive breadth, such as the breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorization. However, little is known about whether the influence of positive affect on cognitive control, which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes, is modulated by the approach motivational intensity of positive affect. Therefore, two experiments in this study were conducted to investigate this issue. In experiment 1, a modified stop-signal task was used to explore the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on inhibition control. The stop signal task involved two concurrent tasks, a primary go task and a secondary stop task. The go task was a two-choice reaction time task that required participants to discriminate the location of black squares (2.4 cm × 2.4 cm) positing on the center of the left or right part of the screen. The stop task, which occurred pseudo-randomly and infrequently (25% of the total trials), involved presentation of a red circle (stop signal) that countermanded the go signal by instructing participants to inhibit their planned response to the go task on that trial. Ninety-one undergraduates were randomly assigned to the three conditions: low approach-motivated positive affect (31, 17 females), high approach-motivated positive affect (30, 16 females), and neutral (30, 16 females) conditions. One-way ANOVAs demonstrated that the effects of emotional pictures on response execution and inhibition were significant. Scheffe tests revealed that, relative to the neutral condition, response inhibition was faster in low approach-motivated positive affect condition, while response execution was faster in high approach-motivated positive affect condition. In experiment 2, we used typical numerical classification tasks to examine the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on task switching. Eighty-four new undergraduates (48 females) were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions. Participants had to judge whether a digit (1~9, excluding 5) was smaller or larger than five (smaller–larger task) or whether it was odd or even (odd–even task). We used either a square or diamond frame with sides that were 4.8 cm in length as task cues to indicate the smaller–larger task or odd–even task, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVAs on reaction time and error rate showed that low approach-motivated positive affect facilitated switched task, while high approach-motivated positive affect facilitated repeated task. Results also indicated that low approach-motivated positive affect reduced reaction time and error switch costs, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect increased reaction time switch costs. In summary, this research suggests that low approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive flexibility, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive stability. The current research extends previous work on cognitive breadth to cognitive control which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes. Taken together, this line of research suggests that the effects of positive affect on cognitive processes are modulated by its approach motivational intensity.

Stimuli with a positive valence can facilitate cognitive control

Neural Responses During Emotion Transitions and Emotion Regulation

Positive emotion modulates cognitive control: an event-related potentials study.

Losing Control in Front of a Fearful Face: the Effect of Emotional Information on Cognitive Control

Positive Emotion Facilitates Cognitive Flexibility: An fMRI Study

The Effect of Low Versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control

Enhanced Conflict-Driven Cognitive Control by Emotional Arousal, Not by Valence

Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivational states

To be angry or happy? Anything works. The interaction of emotional information and scope of attention during inhibitory control

Negative Emotion Interferes with Behavioral Inhibitory Control: an ERP Study

Emotional cues reduce Pavlovian interference in feedback-based go and nogo learning

Motivational intensity modulates the effects of positive emotions on set shifting after controlling physiological arousal

Pleasant Mood Intensifies Brain Processing of Cognitive Control: ERP Correlates

Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.

Getting mixed messages: the impact of conflicting social signals on the brain's target emotional response

Improved Emotional Conflict Control Triggered by the Processing Priority of Negative Emotion

Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion

Independent Effects of Reward Expectation and Spatial Orientation on the Processing of Emotional Facial Expressions.

Word Wins Over Face: Emotional Stroop Effect Activates the Frontal Cortical Network

Valence and arousal of emotional stimuli impact cognitive-motor performance in an oddball task.

The Impact of Emotion Valence on Brain Processing of Behavioral Inhibitory Control: Spatiotemporal Dynamics.