Abstract:The motivational dimensional model of affect, proposed by Gable and Harmon-Jones (2010), posits that approach motivational intensity of positive affect modulates the influence of positive affect on cognition. In line with this model, accumulating evidences have supported this hypothesis. Studies have found that low approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., serenity) broadens, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., desire) narrows cognitive breadth, such as the breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorization. However, little is known about whether the influence of positive affect on cognitive control, which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes, is modulated by the approach motivational intensity of positive affect. Therefore, two experiments in this study were conducted to investigate this issue. In experiment 1, a modified stop-signal task was used to explore the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on inhibition control. The stop signal task involved two concurrent tasks, a primary go task and a secondary stop task. The go task was a two-choice reaction time task that required participants to discriminate the location of black squares (2.4 cm × 2.4 cm) positing on the center of the left or right part of the screen. The stop task, which occurred pseudo-randomly and infrequently (25% of the total trials), involved presentation of a red circle (stop signal) that countermanded the go signal by instructing participants to inhibit their planned response to the go task on that trial. Ninety-one undergraduates were randomly assigned to the three conditions: low approach-motivated positive affect (31, 17 females), high approach-motivated positive affect (30, 16 females), and neutral (30, 16 females) conditions. One-way ANOVAs demonstrated that the effects of emotional pictures on response execution and inhibition were significant. Scheffe tests revealed that, relative to the neutral condition, response inhibition was faster in low approach-motivated positive affect condition, while response execution was faster in high approach-motivated positive affect condition. In experiment 2, we used typical numerical classification tasks to examine the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on task switching. Eighty-four new undergraduates (48 females) were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions. Participants had to judge whether a digit (1~9, excluding 5) was smaller or larger than five (smaller–larger task) or whether it was odd or even (odd–even task). We used either a square or diamond frame with sides that were 4.8 cm in length as task cues to indicate the smaller–larger task or odd–even task, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVAs on reaction time and error rate showed that low approach-motivated positive affect facilitated switched task, while high approach-motivated positive affect facilitated repeated task. Results also indicated that low approach-motivated positive affect reduced reaction time and error switch costs, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect increased reaction time switch costs. In summary, this research suggests that low approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive flexibility, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive stability. The current research extends previous work on cognitive breadth to cognitive control which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes. Taken together, this line of research suggests that the effects of positive affect on cognitive processes are modulated by its approach motivational intensity.

To be angry or happy? Anything works. The interaction of emotional information and scope of attention during inhibitory control

Neural Responses During Emotion Transitions and Emotion Regulation

Losing Control in Front of a Fearful Face: the Effect of Emotional Information on Cognitive Control

Sadness and fear, but not happiness, motivate inhibitory behaviour: the influence of discrete emotions on the executive function of inhibition

Negative Emotion Interferes with Behavioral Inhibitory Control: an ERP Study

Stimuli with a positive valence can facilitate cognitive control

Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict action control when facing emotional stimuli

Don't make me angry, you wouldn't like me when I'm angry: Volitional choices to act or inhibit are modulated by subliminal perception of emotional faces

Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion

Individual differences in inhibitory control are not related to downregulation of negative emotion via distancing.

The Effect of Low Versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control

Control your emotions: evidence for a shared mechanism of cognitive and emotional control

Task-irrelevant Emotional Faces Impair Response Adjustments in a Double-Step Saccade Task

The cognitive control of emotion

Segregating Domain-General from Emotional Context-Specific Inhibitory Control Systems - Ventral Striatum and Orbitofrontal Cortex Serve As Emotion-Cognition Integration Hubs

Induced emotion counter-regulation affects attentional inhibition of emotional information: ERP evidence from a randomized manipulation approach

To Regulate or Not to Regulate: Emotion Regulation in Participants With Low and High Impulsivity

Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition and Conflict Control on Facial Expressions

The Impact of Emotion Valence on Brain Processing of Behavioral Inhibitory Control: Spatiotemporal Dynamics.

Positive emotion modulates cognitive control: an event-related potentials study.

Automatic Emotion Regulation in Response Inhibition: the Temporal Dynamics of Emotion Counter-Regulation During a Go/no-Go Task.