Abstract:It is well known that people will exert effort on a task if sufficiently motivated, but how they distribute these efforts across different strategies (e.g., efficiency vs. caution) remains uncertain. Past work has shown that people invest effort differently for potential positive outcomes (rewards) versus potential negative outcomes (penalties). However, this research failed to account for differences in the context in which negative outcomes motivate someone - either as punishment or reinforcement. It is therefore unclear whether effort profiles differ as a function of outcome valence, motivational context, or both. Using computational modeling and our novel Multi-Incentive Control Task, we show that the influence of aversive outcomes on one's effort profile is entirely determined by their motivational context. Participants (N:91) favored increased caution in response to larger penalties for incorrect responses, and favored increased efficiency in response to larger reinforcement for correct responses, whether positively or negatively incentivized. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: People have to constantly decide how to allocate their mental effort, and in doing so can be motivated by both the positive outcomes that effort accrues and the negative outcomes that effort avoids. For example, someone might persist on a project for work in the hopes of being promoted or to avoid being reprimanded or even fired. Understanding how people weigh these different types of incentives is critical for understanding variability in human achievement as well as sources of motivational impairments (e.g., in major depression). We show that people not only consider both potential positive and negative outcomes when allocating mental effort, but that the profile of effort they engage under negative incentives differs depending on whether that outcome is contingent on sustaining good performance (negative reinforcement) or avoiding bad performance (punishment). Clarifying the motivational factors that determine effort exertion is an important step for understanding motivational impairments in psychopathology.

Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance

I endeavor to make it: effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward.

Dissociable neural after-effects of cognitive and physical effort expenditure during reward evaluation

P2 Manifests Subjective Evaluation of Reward Processing Under Social Comparison

Neural substrates underlying the expectation of rewards resulting from effortful exertion

Neural substrates of the interaction between effort-expenditure reward decision-making and outcome anticipation

Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance

Make or break: The influence of expected challenges and rewards on the motivation and experience associated with cognitive effort exertion

Disentangling Effort from Probability of Success: Temporal Dynamics of Frontal Midline Theta in Effort-Based Reward Processing

Dissociable after-effects of prosocial acts: Effort is costly for others but valued for self

Overlapping Neural Systems Represent Cognitive Effort and Reward Anticipation

Does effort increase or decrease reward valuation? Considerations from cognitive dissonance theory

Mind the instructions: reward cues are liked first, wanted later

The effect of reward expectation on working memory of emotional faces under different levels of cognitive load: an ERP study

The Divergent Impact of Reward Magnitude on Goal Eagerness and Effort Investment

Brain Responses in Evaluating Feedback Stimuli with a Social Dimension.

Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by the presence of an audience: An electrophysiological investigation.

Short-term memory capacity predicts willingness to expend cognitive effort for reward

Motivational context determines the impact of aversive outcomes on mental effort allocation

Electrophysiological correlates of prediction formation in anticipation of reward‐ and punishment‐related feedback signals

Need for cognition moderates cognitive effort aversion