Abstract:Key event-related potentials (ERPs) of perceptual decision-making such as the centroparietal positivity (CPP) elucidate how evidence is accumulated towards a given choice. Furthermore, this accumulation can be impacted by visual target selection signals such as the N2 contralateral (N2c). How these underlying neural mechanisms of perceptual decision-making are influenced by the spatial congruence of distractors relative to target stimuli remains unclear. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) in humans of both sexes to investigate the effect of distractor spatial congruency (same vs. different hemifield relative to targets) on perceptual decision-making. We confirmed that responses for perceptual decisions were slower for spatially incongruent vs. congruent distractors of high salience. Similarly, markers of target selection (N2c peak amplitude) and evidence accumulation (CPP slope) were found to be lower when distractors were spatially incongruent vs. congruent. To evaluate the effects of congruency further, we applied drift diffusion modelling to participant responses, which showed that larger amplitudes of both ERPs were correlated with shorter non-decision times when considering the effect of congruency. The modelling also suggested that congruency's effect on behaviour occurred prior to and during evidence accumulation when considering the effects of the N2c peak and CPP slope. These findings point to spatially incongruent distractors, relative to congruent distractors, influencing decisions as early as the initial sensory processing phase, then continuing to exert an effect as evidence is accumulated throughout the decision-making process. Overall, our findings highlight how key electrophysiological signals of perceptual decision-making are influenced by the spatial congruence of target and distractor.Significance Statement When making perceptual decisions, we often need to focus on task-relevant targets while ignoring irrelevant distractors. In this study, we show that salient distractors in the opposite visual hemifield capture attention with consequences for the speed and accuracy of decisions. Electrophysiological signals of perceptual decision-making were attenuated by spatially incongruent distractors relative to congruent distractors. Computational modelling suggested that the influence of spatial congruency of target and distractor on the electrophysiological markers of target selection and evidence accumulation occurred during the initial sensory processing phase preceding evidence accumulation, which continued as evidence was accumulated throughout the decision process. Our findings, therefore, suggest that the spatial congruence of target and distractor impacts the dynamics of electrophysiological signals of perceptual decision-making.

Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations

Differential modulation of auditory responses to attended and unattended speech in different listening conditions.

Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms

Neural Suppression of Distractors Surrounding the Spotlight: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

A dissociation between the effects of expectations and attention in selective visual processing

Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages

Dissociable dynamic effects of expectation during statistical learning

Statistical learning shapes distractor suppression

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

The effect of congruent vs. incongruent distractor positioning on electrophysiological signals during perceptual decision-making

Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation

Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction

Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load

Event-related potentials of stimuli inhibition and access in cross-modal distractor-induced blindness

Reward expectation modulates N2pc for target selection: Electrophysiological evidence

Perceptual target discriminability modulates the Simon effect beyond the fading of distractor-based activation: Insights from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.

Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing

Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology

Learned relevance of a distracting cue can influence feature interference errors