Abstract:Visual attentional selection is influenced by the value of objects. Previous studies have demonstrated that reward-associated items lead to rapid distraction and associated behavioral costs, which are difficult to override with top-down control. However, it has not been determined whether a perceptually competitive environment could render the reward-driven distraction more susceptible to top-down suppression. Here, we trained both genders of human subjects to associate two orientations with high and low magnitudes of reward. After training, we collected fMRI data while the subjects performed a categorical visual search task. The item in the reward-associated orientation served as the distractor, and the relative physical salience between the target and distractor was carefully controlled to modulate the degree of perceptual competition. The behavioral results showed faster searches in the presence of high, relative to low, reward-associated distractors. However, this effect was evident only if the physical salience of the distractor was higher than that of the target, indicating a context-dependent suppression effect of reward salience that relied on high perceptual competition. By analyzing the fMRI data in primary visual cortex, we found that the behavioral pattern of results could be predicted by the suppressed channel responses tuned to the reward-associated orientation in the distractor location, accompanied by increased responses in the midbrain dopaminergic region. Our results suggest that the learned salience of a reward plays a flexible role in solving perceptual competition, enabling the neural system to adaptively modulate the perceptual representation for behavioral optimization.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The predictiveness principle in learning theory suggests that the stimulus with high predictability of reward receives priority in attentional selection. This selection bias leads to difficulties in changing approach behaviors, and thus becomes an important factor related to psychiatric disorders with attentional deficits. Here, we demonstrated that such principle is adaptively implemented in attentional suppression in visual search. We showed that the learned salience induced the suppression of the reward-associated distractor if its competition with the target was strong and could not be readily solved. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased midbrain fMRI activity and weakened sensory representation of the reward-associated distractor in V1. Our findings provided direct evidence that our brain flexibly uses learned regularities in attentional control.

Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology

Neural Suppression of Distractors Surrounding the Spotlight: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

Separate Cue- and Alpha-Related Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression

Testing the contributions of proactive target and distractor templates in visual search performance

Pinging the Hidden Attentional Priority Map: Suppression Needs Attention

Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction

Statistical learning shapes distractor suppression

Attentional Selection and Suppression in Children and Adults.

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

Visual Distraction's "Silver Lining": Distractor Suppression Boosts Attention to Competing Stimuli

Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory

Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages

Shared and Distinct Structure-Function Substrates of Heterogenous Distractor Suppression Ability Between High and Low Working Memory Capacity Individuals.

Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search

The proactive and reactive mechanisms of learned spatial suppression

Neural mechanisms for secondary suppression of emotional distractors: Evidence from concurrent electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography data

Memory Guidance in Distractor Suppression is Governed by the Availability of Cognitive Control

Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression