Abstract:AIM: Stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) is the performance of participants influenced by the similarity of stimulus and response properties. The dimensional overlap between cue and target also influences the performance of participants. The present study was aimed to investigate whether the compatibility effect occurs when the cues and stimuli overlap non-spatially. Furthermore, it examined the neural basis of SRC in the conditions of cue-response incompatibility and stimulus-response incompatibility. METHODS: The experiment was performed in November 2003 in the laboratory of the School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University. The lab was soundproof and dark. Participants involved in the experiment were 12 undergraduates with right-handedness, with normal or correct-to-normal vision and normal color vision. The materials were two-dimensional and three-dimensional red, green, and blue geometrical shapes. The procedure of a trial was as follows: First, a red cross as the fixation was presented on the central of screen for 1 000 ms; then a cue for 1 000 ms; and a target. The intervals between them were 300 ms. Participants were asked to press the keys, 1, 2, 4 on the response box to make a response. There were 216 trials that lasted about 50 minutes. For a given participant, the experimental conditions were identical and the electrophysiological data were recorded from 200 ms before the targets were presented to 1 000 ms after targets presentation except that during practice no electrophysiological data were recorded. Peak values were measured between 100-160 ms, and between 280-400 ms(for front and central electrode sites: F1, F2, F3, F4, Fz; C1, C2, C3, C4, Cz). Peak values were also measured between 100-160 ms, 170-230 ms, 320-420 ms (for back electrode sites: P1, P2, P3, P4, Pz, O1, O2, Oz). Response accuracy and the reaction time of correct trials were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The data for 12 participants were all involved in the statistical analysis. ①N1 and P3 of frontal and parietal: In time window of 100-160 ms, the main effects of conditions and electrode positions on N1 were significant, while the interaction of conditions and electrode positions did not reach significance. In time window of 280-400 ms, the main effect of conditions on P3 was nearly significant, but the main effect of electrode positions was significant. ②P1,N2, and P3 of occipital: The interaction of conditions and electrode positions on P1 and N2 was not significant. The main effect of conditions on P1 did not reach significance. But the main effect of electrode positions was significant. The main effects of conditions and electrode positions on N2 were nearly significant. However, the interactions on P1 and N2 were not significant. The interaction of conditions and electrode positions on P3 was significant. So, the analysis of simple effects was performed. ③Latency: The main effects of conditions on N1 and P3 of Frontal and Parietal were significant, but there were no significant main effects on P1, N2 and P3 of occipital. N1 of Frontal and Parietal was more sensitive to shapes of stimuli, while P3 was more sensitive to stimulus colors during the earlier performance of SRC tasks.CONCLUSION: The early processing of SRC tasks activates the brain areas of Frontal and parietal, while the later processing, that is response selection, activates brain areas of occipital. N1 of frontal and parietal is more sensitive to shapes of stimuli, but P3 is more sensitive to stimulus color during the earlier performance of SRC tasks. The effects of SRC may result from transformation of vision and action or from the selection of different responses. However, attention plays an important role in the processing of SRC tasks.

An event-related potential study on stimulus-response compatibility and dimensional overlap of non-spatial cue and target