Abstract:Previous event-related potential (ERP) studies investigating the typicality effects during category-based reasoning were conducted during the deduction and induction phases by comparing typical and atypical conclusion categories,without property inference processes.In the present study,the ERP responses to both conclusion typicality effects (strengthening of the inference from "durian has the novel property X1" to "apple has the novel property X1" [a typical conclusion]was stronger than the inference from "durian has the novel property X1" to "Chinese date has the novel property X1 [an atypical conclusion],experiment 1) and premise typicality effects (strengthening of the inference from "apple has the novel property X1"[a typical premise]to "durian has the novel property X1" was stronger than the inference from "Chinese date has the novel property X1"[an atypical premise] to "durian has the novel property X1",experiment 2) during category-based induction were measured by separately presenting the conclusion categories and conclusion properties.The results of both the experiments showed that,during the conclusion-category stage,typical conditions elicited larger P2 responses than atypical conditions,suggesting increased semantic feature activity in typical conditions.Additionally,atypical conditions elicited larger N400 responses than typical conditions,suggesting the increased cognitive effort related to semantic integration in atypical conditions than in typical conditions.During the conclusion-property stage,when participants accepted the inferences,both the experiments showed that typical conditions elicited larger P3b responses than atypical conditions,reflecting the higher degree of expected satisfaction during reasoning.Therefore,when the inferences were positive during category-based induction,N400 responses indexed the typicality effects during the conclusion-category stage,whereas P3b responses indexed the typicality effects during the conclusion-property stage.

FN400 Amplitudes Reveal the Differentiation of Semantic Inferences Within Natural Vs. Artificial Domains

Electrophysiological Differences Between Specific and General Conclusions During Category-Based Induction

The neuromechanism underlying verbal analogical reasoning of metaphorical relations: An event-related potentials study

FN400 and Sustained Negativity Reveal a Premise Monotonicity Effect During Semantic Category-Based Induction.

Reward inference by prefrontal neurons

Event-related Potential Parameters of Category and Property Violations During Semantic Category-Based Induction.

P300 and positive slow waves reveal the plausibility in inductive reasoning.

How Do the Hierarchical Levels of Premises Affect Category-Based Induction: Diverging Effects from the P300 and N400.

P3a amplitude is related to conclusion specificity during category-based induction

Neural Oscillation Profiles of a Premise Monotonicity Effect During Semantic Category-Based Induction

Common and distinctive cognitive processes between categorization and category-based induction: Evidence from event-related potentials

ERP evidence for Temporal differences between Cross-modal and Cross-domain Analogical reasoning

Domain-specific representation of social inference by neurons in the human amygdala and hippocampus

ERP characteristics of sentential inductive reasoning in time and frequency domains

The Processing of Causal and Hierarchical Relations in Semantic Memory As Revealed by N400 and Frontal Negativity

Event-related potential parameters related to typicality effects during category-based induction

Automatic processing of taxonomic and thematic relations in semantic priming - Differentiation by early N400 and late frontal negativity.

Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Category-based Feature Inference

How Does Typicality of Category Members Affect the Deductive Reasoning? an ERP Study

Differentiation of the Contribution of Familiarity and Recollection to the Old/New Effects in Associative Recognition: Insight from Semantic Relation

How Types of Premises Modulate the Typicality Effect in Category-Based Induction: Diverging Evidence from the P2, P3, and LPC Effects.