Abstract:People are inclined to look for more diversity evidences to support the conclusion in their induction, because more diverse evidence leads to a stronger conclusion. This phenomenon is defined as the diversity effects of induction. Prior researches demonstrated that adults have this useful strategy for evaluating samples that contain single versus multiple pieces of evidence. However, there is a controversy regarding the criteria that children used to evaluate the multiple samples. The main debate is whether or not children who are younger than nine years old have diversity effects in their induction. Some researchers considered that children who are younger than nine years old do not attend to sample diversity to evaluate evidence, because there are important developmental changes in the mechanisms that support human induction. Other researchers held that young children have the diversity effects in their inductive reasoning. Those researchers suggest that the developmental changes underlie the inductive reasoning result from limitations in young children’s knowledge base. Therefore, they argued that the results that previous studies could not find children’s diversity performance are artificial as the paradigms or materials they used in their researches were unfit for young children. In order to explore the problem whether young children have diversity effects, three experiments were performed. Experiment 1 used picture materials, and adopted the paradigm of Rhodes, etc. (2008a); twenty-four children at five years old and forty adults participated in this experiment. Experiment 2 used the same materials as experiment 1, but adopted a more direct technique paradigm; forty children at five years old participated in the experiment. Experiment 3 adopted the same method as experiment 1, but used common objects which children are familiar with as experimental materials; forty children at three years old participated in the experiment. The results of experiment 1 indicated that adults had diversity effects in their induction, while five years old children had typicality effects but not diversity effects when they made induction of the animal pictures. This finding is consistent with the results of Rhodes, etc. (2008a). The results of experiment 2 demonstrated that children as young as five years old could utilize the diversity strategy in induction. The results of experiment 3 manifested that three-year-old children had diversity effects when they were making induction of familiar objects. The findings of this article indicate that children as young as three years old could value diverse evidence in their inductive reasoning, which suggest that children may have diversity effects in inductive reasoning. The controversy whether children have diversity effects or not may mainly results from the different experimental paradigms and materials used by prior researchers. The reason why some previous studies have not found diversity effects of young children probably because they used unsuited detection paradigms or materials. The present work suggests that psychological experiment of young children should be done under appropriate experimental situation.

The Induction of Unfamiliar Materials with Familiar Category Labels

The Influence of Induction in 3-year-olds

Relationship between Categorization and Category-based Induction in Early Age

Feature Similarity and Category Labels in Inductive Reasoning

What's in a name? Similar and indentical labels in Chinese children's induction

The Role of Labels in Children’s Inductive Reasoning

Induction and Learning

Feature Similarity, Category Labels,and Causal Relations in Inductive Reasoning

Category Label Effects on Chinese Children's Inductive Inferences: Modulation by Perceptual Detail and Category Specificity.

The Research of People' Induction when Categorization was Uncertain

Evidence of a transition from perceptual to category induction in 3- to 9-year-old children

Children's Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences and Scalar Implicatures

A Study of Concept-based Inductive Inference of Infants and Young Children

The role of category label in adults' inductive reasoning

The Influence of Color, Size, Shape Similarity and Difference on Children's Inductive Reasoning

Comments on Two Kinds of Theories about Children's Inductive Reasoning

Electrophysiological Correlates of Category Induction in Children and Adults

Diversity Effect In Category-Based Inductive Reasoning Of Young Children: Evidence From Two Methods

Young Children’s Diversity Effects in Inductive Reasoning

Testimony and observation of statistical evidence interact in adults' and children's category-based induction

5-year-olds' Featural Information Recognition of Familiar Faces