Abstract:Reliability is necessary in safety-critical applications spanning numerous domains. Conventional hardware-based fault tolerance techniques, such as component redundancy, ensure reliability, typically at the expense of significantly increased power consumption, and almost double (or more) hardware area. To mitigate these costs, microarchitectural fault tolerance methods try to lower overheads by leveraging microarchitectural insights, but prior evaluations focus primarily on only application performance. As different safety-critical applications prioritize different requirements beyond reliability, evaluating only limited metrics cannot guarantee that microarchitectural methods are practical and usable for all different application scenarios. To this end, in this work, we extensively characterize and compare three fault detection methods, each representing a different major fault detection category, considering real requirements from diverse application settings and employing various important metrics such as design area, power, performance overheads and latency in detection. Through this analysis, we provide important insights which may guide designers in applying the most effective fault tolerance method tailored to specific needs, advancing the overall understanding and development of robust computing systems. For this, we study three methods for hardware error detection within a processor, i.e., (i) Dual Modular Redundancy (DMR) as a conventional method, and (ii) Redundant Multithreading (R-SMT) and (iii) Parallel Error Detection (ParDet) as microarchitecture-level methods. We demonstrate that microarchitectural fault tolerance, i.e., R-SMT and ParDet, is comparably robust compared to conventional approaches (DMR), however, still exhibits unappealing trade-offs for specific real-world use cases, thus precluding their usage in certain application scenarios.

A Framework to Evaluate the Trade-Off among AVF, Performance and Area of Soft Error Tolerant Microprocessors

Process Variation and Temperature-Aware Reliability Management

A Statistical Framework for Post-Fabrication Oxide Breakdown Reliability Prediction and Management

A new reliability evaluation method for embedded system

Process Variation and Temperature-Aware Full Chip Oxide Breakdown Reliability Analysis.

A Cross-Layer Framework for Early-Stage Full Chip Oxide Breakdown Reliability Analysis

A Flexible Soft Error Mitigation Framework Leveraging Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Technology

An Accurate Cross-Layer Approach for Online Architectural Vulnerability Estimation

Techniques to Reduce the Soft Error Rate of a High-Performance Microprocessor

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Microarchitectural Hardware Fault Detection for Application-Specific Requirements

General Efficient TMR for Combinational Circuit Hardening Against Soft Errors and Improved Multi-Objective Optimization Framework

A Framework for Estimating NBTI Degradation of Microarchitectural Components

DMBF: Design Metrics Balancing Framework for Soft-Error-Tolerant Digital Circuits Through Bayesian Optimization

Eliminating Timing Errors Through Collaborative Design to Maximize the Throughput

An Energy-Efficient Microprocessor Using Multilevel Error Correction For Timing Error Tolerance

Tolerating Soft Errors in Processor Cores Using CLEAR (Cross-Layer Exploration for Architecting Resilience)

CLEAR: Cross-Layer Exploration for Architecting Resilience - Combining Hardware and Software Techniques to Tolerate Soft Errors in Processor Cores

Characterizing the Effects of Intermittent Faults on a Processor for Dependability Enhancement Strategy

In-Field Logic Repair of Deep Sub-Micron CMOS Processors

Cross-level Monte Carlo Framework for System Vulnerability Evaluation Against Fault Attack

On the Characterization and Optimization of System-Level Vulnerability for Instruction Caches in Embedded Processors