Evaluating the Effectiveness of Microarchitectural Hardware Fault Detection for Application-Specific Requirements

Konstantinos-Nikolaos Papadopoulos,Christina Giannoula,Nikolaos-Charalampos Papadopoulos,Nektarios Koziris,José M.G. Merayo,Dionisios N. Pnevmatikatos

2024-08-12

Abstract:Reliability is necessary in safety-critical applications spanning numerous domains. Conventional hardware-based fault tolerance techniques, such as component redundancy, ensure reliability, typically at the expense of significantly increased power consumption, and almost double (or more) hardware area. To mitigate these costs, microarchitectural fault tolerance methods try to lower overheads by leveraging microarchitectural insights, but prior evaluations focus primarily on only application performance. As different safety-critical applications prioritize different requirements beyond reliability, evaluating only limited metrics cannot guarantee that microarchitectural methods are practical and usable for all different application scenarios. To this end, in this work, we extensively characterize and compare three fault detection methods, each representing a different major fault detection category, considering real requirements from diverse application settings and employing various important metrics such as design area, power, performance overheads and latency in detection. Through this analysis, we provide important insights which may guide designers in applying the most effective fault tolerance method tailored to specific needs, advancing the overall understanding and development of robust computing systems. For this, we study three methods for hardware error detection within a processor, i.e., (i) Dual Modular Redundancy (DMR) as a conventional method, and (ii) Redundant Multithreading (R-SMT) and (iii) Parallel Error Detection (ParDet) as microarchitecture-level methods. We demonstrate that microarchitectural fault tolerance, i.e., R-SMT and ParDet, is comparably robust compared to conventional approaches (DMR), however, still exhibits unappealing trade-offs for specific real-world use cases, thus precluding their usage in certain application scenarios.

Hardware Architecture

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issue of evaluating the effectiveness of microarchitecture-level hardware fault detection methods in different application scenarios. Specifically, researchers have found that traditional hardware fault tolerance techniques (such as component redundancy) can ensure system reliability but significantly increase power consumption and hardware area. In contrast, microarchitecture-level fault tolerance methods attempt to reduce these overheads by leveraging microarchitectural features. However, previous studies have mainly focused on application performance and have not comprehensively evaluated other key metrics (such as design area, power consumption, performance overhead, and detection latency). Therefore, the goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive characterization and comparison of three different fault detection methods, considering the actual needs from diverse application environments, and using multiple important metrics for evaluation. This aims to offer insights that guide designers in choosing the most suitable fault tolerance method for specific needs, thereby promoting the development and understanding of robust computing systems. These three methods include: Dual Modular Redundancy (DMR), Redundant Multi-Threading (R-SMT), and Parallel Error Detection (ParDet). By comparing and analyzing these methods, the researchers hope to reveal the trade-offs among various methods in terms of reliability, latency, performance, area, and power consumption, thus providing a basis for selecting the optimal fault detection strategy for different application scenarios.