Abstract:We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal welfare comparisons are encoded in a single 'individual preorder'. The theorems give axioms that uniquely determine a social preorder in terms of this individual preorder. The social preorders described by these theorems have features that may be considered characteristic of Harsanyi-style utilitarianism, such as indifference to ex ante and ex post equality. However, the theorems are also consistent with the rejection of all of the expected utility axioms, completeness, continuity, and independence, at both the individual and social levels. In that sense, expected utility is inessential to Harsanyi-style utilitarianism. In fact, the variable population theorem imposes only a mild constraint on the individual preorder, while the constant population theorem imposes no constraint at all. We then derive further results under the assumption of our basic axioms. First, the individual preorder satisfies the main expected utility axiom of strong independence if and only if the social preorder has a vector-valued expected total utility representation, covering Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem as a special case. Second, stronger utilitarian-friendly assumptions, like Pareto or strong separability, are essentially equivalent to strong independence. Third, if the individual preorder satisfies a 'local expected utility' condition popular in non-expected utility theory, then the social preorder has a 'local expected total utility' representation. Fourth, a wide range of non-expected utility theories nevertheless lead to social preorders of outcomes that have been seen as canonically egalitarian, such as rank-dependent social preorders. Although our aggregation theorems are stated under conditions of risk, they are valid in more general frameworks for representing uncertainty or ambiguity.

Impartiality and relative utilitarianism

Revealed Relative Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism with and without expected utility

Relative utilitarianism under uncertainty

Exploring infinite population utilitarianism under strong anonymity

Reducing Leximin Fairness to Utilitarian Optimization

Old and new joint characterizations of leximin and variants of rank-weighted utilitarianism

Utilitarian Theorems and Equivalence of Utility Theories

Multiperson utility

A characterization of unanimity with status quo: Fixed vs variable population

Uniform Welfare Guarantees Under Identical Subadditive Valuations

Axiomatic Foundations for a Class of Generalized Expected Utility: Algebraic Expected Utility

Maximal Social Welfare Relations on Infinite Populations Satisfying Permutation Invariance

Settling the Score: Portioning with Cardinal Preferences

A General Framework for Fair Allocation under Matroid Rank Valuations

Two principles for two-person social choice

Social Welfare Functions with Voters Qualifications: Impossibility Results

Harm Ratio: A Novel and Versatile Fairness Criterion

A new social welfare function with a number of desirable properties

Fairness As a Robust Utilitarianism

J. S. Mill's Liberal Principle and Unanimity