Abstract:We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal welfare comparisons are encoded in a single 'individual preorder'. The theorems give axioms that uniquely determine a social preorder in terms of this individual preorder. The social preorders described by these theorems have features that may be considered characteristic of Harsanyi-style utilitarianism, such as indifference to ex ante and ex post equality. However, the theorems are also consistent with the rejection of all of the expected utility axioms, completeness, continuity, and independence, at both the individual and social levels. In that sense, expected utility is inessential to Harsanyi-style utilitarianism. In fact, the variable population theorem imposes only a mild constraint on the individual preorder, while the constant population theorem imposes no constraint at all. We then derive further results under the assumption of our basic axioms. First, the individual preorder satisfies the main expected utility axiom of strong independence if and only if the social preorder has a vector-valued expected total utility representation, covering Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem as a special case. Second, stronger utilitarian-friendly assumptions, like Pareto or strong separability, are essentially equivalent to strong independence. Third, if the individual preorder satisfies a 'local expected utility' condition popular in non-expected utility theory, then the social preorder has a 'local expected total utility' representation. Fourth, a wide range of non-expected utility theories nevertheless lead to social preorders of outcomes that have been seen as canonically egalitarian, such as rank-dependent social preorders. Although our aggregation theorems are stated under conditions of risk, they are valid in more general frameworks for representing uncertainty or ambiguity.

Old and new joint characterizations of leximin and variants of rank-weighted utilitarianism

A new social welfare function with a number of desirable properties

"Near" Weighted Utilitarian Characterizations of Pareto Optima

Reducing Leximin Fairness to Utilitarian Optimization

Impartiality and relative utilitarianism

The Leximin Approach for a Sequence of Collective Decisions

Maximal Social Welfare Relations on Infinite Populations Satisfying Permutation Invariance

Desirability and social rankings

A General Framework for Fair Allocation under Matroid Rank Valuations

Revealed Relative Utilitarianism

A characterization of unanimity with status quo: Fixed vs variable population

Utilitarianism with and without expected utility

Social Welfare Functions with Voters Qualifications: Impossibility Results

Efficient Inference and Computation of Optimal Alternatives for Preference Languages Based On Lexicographic Models

Coarse Descriptions and Cautious Preferences

Condorcet Consistency And Pairwise Justifiability Under Variable Agendas

Haves and Have-Nots: A Theory of Economic Sufficientarianism

The Fairness of Maximum Nash Social Welfare Under Matroid Constraints and Beyond

On Strongly-equitable Social Welfare Orders Without the Axiom of Choice

The Fairness of Leximin in Allocation of Indivisible Chores

Two characterizations of the dense rank