Abstract:We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal welfare comparisons are encoded in a single 'individual preorder'. The theorems give axioms that uniquely determine a social preorder in terms of this individual preorder. The social preorders described by these theorems have features that may be considered characteristic of Harsanyi-style utilitarianism, such as indifference to ex ante and ex post equality. However, the theorems are also consistent with the rejection of all of the expected utility axioms, completeness, continuity, and independence, at both the individual and social levels. In that sense, expected utility is inessential to Harsanyi-style utilitarianism. In fact, the variable population theorem imposes only a mild constraint on the individual preorder, while the constant population theorem imposes no constraint at all. We then derive further results under the assumption of our basic axioms. First, the individual preorder satisfies the main expected utility axiom of strong independence if and only if the social preorder has a vector-valued expected total utility representation, covering Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem as a special case. Second, stronger utilitarian-friendly assumptions, like Pareto or strong separability, are essentially equivalent to strong independence. Third, if the individual preorder satisfies a 'local expected utility' condition popular in non-expected utility theory, then the social preorder has a 'local expected total utility' representation. Fourth, a wide range of non-expected utility theories nevertheless lead to social preorders of outcomes that have been seen as canonically egalitarian, such as rank-dependent social preorders. Although our aggregation theorems are stated under conditions of risk, they are valid in more general frameworks for representing uncertainty or ambiguity.

Exploring infinite population utilitarianism under strong anonymity

Intertemporal population ethics: critical-level utilitarian principles

Impartiality and relative utilitarianism

Fundamental utilitarianism and intergenerational equity with extinction discounting

Utilitarianism with and without expected utility

Population ethical intuitions

Asymptotic welfare performance of Boston assignment algorithms

Revealed Relative Utilitarianism

Non-Additive Axiologies in Large Worlds

Optimal Population in a Finite Horizon

On modeling human perceptions of allocation policies with uncertain outcomes

Fair and Efficient Allocations Without Obvious Manipulations

Fairness As a Robust Utilitarianism

Online Submodular Welfare Maximization Meets Post-Allocation Stochasticity and Reusability

Social Preferences and Deliberately Stochastic Behavior

From Utilitarian to Rawlsian Designs for Algorithmic Fairness

Buying private data without verification

Coexistence of Strong and Weak Social Ties Leads to Fair Allocations of Resources in Finite Populations

Mathematical foundations of moral preferences

Social Welfare in One-sided Matching Markets without Money

Optimal Auctions vs. Anonymous Pricing: Beyond Linear Utility