Abstract:We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal welfare comparisons are encoded in a single 'individual preorder'. The theorems give axioms that uniquely determine a social preorder in terms of this individual preorder. The social preorders described by these theorems have features that may be considered characteristic of Harsanyi-style utilitarianism, such as indifference to ex ante and ex post equality. However, the theorems are also consistent with the rejection of all of the expected utility axioms, completeness, continuity, and independence, at both the individual and social levels. In that sense, expected utility is inessential to Harsanyi-style utilitarianism. In fact, the variable population theorem imposes only a mild constraint on the individual preorder, while the constant population theorem imposes no constraint at all. We then derive further results under the assumption of our basic axioms. First, the individual preorder satisfies the main expected utility axiom of strong independence if and only if the social preorder has a vector-valued expected total utility representation, covering Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem as a special case. Second, stronger utilitarian-friendly assumptions, like Pareto or strong separability, are essentially equivalent to strong independence. Third, if the individual preorder satisfies a 'local expected utility' condition popular in non-expected utility theory, then the social preorder has a 'local expected total utility' representation. Fourth, a wide range of non-expected utility theories nevertheless lead to social preorders of outcomes that have been seen as canonically egalitarian, such as rank-dependent social preorders. Although our aggregation theorems are stated under conditions of risk, they are valid in more general frameworks for representing uncertainty or ambiguity.

Intertemporal population ethics: critical-level utilitarian principles

Population ethical intuitions

Exploring infinite population utilitarianism under strong anonymity

Fundamental utilitarianism and intergenerational equity with extinction discounting

Intertemporal Altruism

Utilitarianism with and without expected utility

Utilitarianism on the front lines: COVID-19, public ethics, and the "hidden assumption" problem

Two asymmetries in population and general normative ethics

Optimal Population in a Finite Horizon

On Some Implications of Backward Discounting

The Tragedy of the Commons and Population Health: The State’s Intervention in an Individual’s Actions and Choices from a Capability Perspective

A Multicriteria Macroeconomic Model with Intertemporal Equity and Spatial Spillovers

Incorporating conditional morality into economic decisions

Social Choice with Changing Preferences: Representation Theorems and Long-Run Policies

Intuitions of Compromise: Utilitarianism vs. Contractualism

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

Non-Additive Axiologies in Large Worlds

Combining distributive ethics and causal Inference to make trade-offs between austerity and population health

Just Better Utilitarianism

Fair long-term care insurance

Intertemporal prosocial behavior: a review and research agenda