Abstract:We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal welfare comparisons are encoded in a single 'individual preorder'. The theorems give axioms that uniquely determine a social preorder in terms of this individual preorder. The social preorders described by these theorems have features that may be considered characteristic of Harsanyi-style utilitarianism, such as indifference to ex ante and ex post equality. However, the theorems are also consistent with the rejection of all of the expected utility axioms, completeness, continuity, and independence, at both the individual and social levels. In that sense, expected utility is inessential to Harsanyi-style utilitarianism. In fact, the variable population theorem imposes only a mild constraint on the individual preorder, while the constant population theorem imposes no constraint at all. We then derive further results under the assumption of our basic axioms. First, the individual preorder satisfies the main expected utility axiom of strong independence if and only if the social preorder has a vector-valued expected total utility representation, covering Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem as a special case. Second, stronger utilitarian-friendly assumptions, like Pareto or strong separability, are essentially equivalent to strong independence. Third, if the individual preorder satisfies a 'local expected utility' condition popular in non-expected utility theory, then the social preorder has a 'local expected total utility' representation. Fourth, a wide range of non-expected utility theories nevertheless lead to social preorders of outcomes that have been seen as canonically egalitarian, such as rank-dependent social preorders. Although our aggregation theorems are stated under conditions of risk, they are valid in more general frameworks for representing uncertainty or ambiguity.

Utilitarian Theorems and Equivalence of Utility Theories

Impartiality and relative utilitarianism

Utilitarianism with and without expected utility

The Relationship between Consumer Theories with and without Utility Maximization

Some Reflections on Utility

Paradox-Proof Utility Functions for Heavy-Tailed Payoffs: Two Instructive Two-Envelope Problems

An Axiom for Concavifiable Preferences in View of Alt's Theory

Just Better Utilitarianism

Remarks on the Afriat's theorem and the Monge-Kantorovich problem

Axiomatic Foundations for a Class of Generalized Expected Utility: Algebraic Expected Utility

Exploring infinite population utilitarianism under strong anonymity

Collective or individual rationality in the Nash bargaining solution: efficiency-free characterizations

Common Mathematical Foundations of Expected Utility and Dual Utility Theories

Relative Net Utility and the Saint Petersburg Paradox

A theory of anticipated utility

The Algebra of Utility Inference

Revealed Relative Utilitarianism

Intuitions of Compromise: Utilitarianism vs. Contractualism

Hypothesis of Generalized Utility

The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare

On the Equivalence of Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Implementation for Environments with Nonlinear Utilities