Abstract:Background Delivery variations during radiotherapy can cause discrepancies between planned and delivered dose distribution. These variations could arise from random and systematic offsets in certain machine parameters or systematic offsets related to the calibration process of the treatment unit. Purpose The aim of this study was to present a novel simulation‐based methodology to evaluate realistic delivery variations in three dimensions (3D). Additionally, we investigated the dosimetric impact of delivery variations for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for different treatment sites and complexities. Methods Twelve VMAT plans for different treatment sites (prostate‐, head & neck‐, lung‐, and gynecological cancer) were selected. The clinical plan used for the treatment of each patient was reoptimized to create one plan with reduced complexity (i.e., simple plan) and one of higher complexity (i.e., complex plan). This resulted in a total of 36 plans. Delivery variations were simulated by randomly introducing offsets in multi‐leaf collimator position, jaw position, gantry angle and collimator angle simultaneously. Twenty simulations were carried out for each of the 36 plans, yielding 720 simulated deliveries. To explore the impact of individual offsets, additional simulations were conducted for each type of offset separately. A 3D dose calculation was performed for each simulation using the same calculation engine as for the clinical plan. Two standard deviations (2SD) of dose were determined for every voxel for 3D‐spatial evaluations. The dose variation in certain DVH metrics, that is, D2% and D98% for the clinical target volume and five different DVH metrics for selected organs at risk, was calculated for the twenty simulated deliveries of each plan. For comparison, the effect of delivery variations was assessed by conducting measurements with the Delta4 phantom. Results The volume of voxels with 2SD above 1% of the prescribed dose was consistently larger for the complex plans in comparison to their corresponding simple and clinical plans. 2SDs larger than 1% were in many cases, found to accumulate outside the planning target volume. For complex plans, regions with 2SDs larger than 1% were detected also inside the high dose region, exhibiting, on average, a size six times larger volume, than those observed in simple plans. Similar results were found for all treatment sites. Variation in the selected DVH metrics for the simulated deliveries was generally largest for the complex plans with few exceptions. When comparing the 2SD distribution of the measurements with the 2SD distribution from the simulations, the spatial information showed deviations outside the PTV in both simulations and measurements. However, the measured values were, on average, 35% higher for the prostate plans and 10% higher for the head & neck plans compared to the simulated values. Conclusions The presented methodology effectively quantified and localized dose deviations due to delivery offsets. The 3D analysis provided information that was undetectable using the analysis based on DVH metrics. Dosimetric uncertainties due to delivery variations were prominent at the edge of the high‐dose region irrespective of treatment site and plan complexity. Dosimetric uncertainties inside the high‐dose region was more profound for plans of higher complexity.

The delivery assessment for small targets on Halcyon radiotherapy system – Measured and calculated dose comparison

Halcyon Clinical Performance Evaluation: A Log File-Based Study in Comparison with a C-arm Linac.

Comparative assessment and QA measurement array validation of Monte Carlo and Collapsed Cone dose algorithms for small fields and clinical treatment plans

Stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial tumor beds on a ring‐mounted Halcyon LINAC

Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the helical diode array using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for small targets

Impact of delivery variations on 3D dose distributions for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of various complexity

A Simulated Dosimetric Study of Contribution to Radiotherapy Accuracy by Fractional Image Guidance Protocol of Halcyon System

VMAT plan quality comparison between Clinac-iX and halcyon treatment delivery systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

A dosimetric phantom study of dose accuracy and build-up effects using IMRT and RapidArc in stereotactic irradiation of lung tumours

Benchmarking halcyon ring delivery system for hypofractionated breast radiotherapy: Validation and clinical implementation of the fast-forward trial

A Preliminary Simulation Study of Dose-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy Based on Halcyon MV Cone-Beam CT Images With Retrospective Data From a Phase II Clinical Trial

Technical note: Phantom-based evaluation of CBCT dose calculation accuracy for use in adaptive radiotherapy

A Comparative Study of Dosimetric Verification of Halcyon™ Treatment Plans Using Varian Portal Dosimetry and PTW Array 1500

Automated target placement for VMAT lattice radiation therapy: enhancing efficiency and consistency

Retrospective Quality Metrics Review of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans Treating Multiple Targets Using Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Quantification of Treatment Plan Deliverability in Breast Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy With Agility Multi-leaf Collimator

Portability of IMRT QA between matched linear accelerators

Effectiveness of a 2D-Transit Epid-Based In-Vivo Dosimetry System in Highlighting the Accuracy of Target Dose Coverage for Post-Mastectomy VMAT Irradiation

Validation of Acuros for total body irradiation at extended distance

Dose conformity and falloff in single‐lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods

A Clinical Monte Carlo Dosimetric Evaluation in Accelerated Partial Breast Electronic Brachytherapy