Abstract:Introduction Single or multi-fraction (mf) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an indispensable treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). The integration of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) into linac-based SRS is expected to further enhance efficacy and safety and to expand the indications for the challenging type of BMs. However, the optimal treatment design and relevant optimization method for volumetric modulated arc-based radiosurgery (VMARS) remain unestablished with substantial inter-institutional differences. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the optimal dose distribution suitable for VMARS of BMs, especially regarding dose inhomogeneity of the gross tumor volume (GTV). The GTV boundary, not margin-added planning target volume, was regarded as a basis for planning optimization and dose prescription. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM. Eight sphere-shaped objects with diameters of 5-40 mm in 5-mm increments were assumed as GTVs. The treatment system included a 5-mm leaf width multileaf collimator (MLC) Agility® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and a dedicated planning system Monaco® (Elekta AB). The prescribed dose (PD) was uniformly assigned to just cover 98% of the GTV (D98%). Three VMARS plans with different dose inhomogeneities of the GTV were generated for each GTV: the % isodose surfaces (IDSs) of GTV D98%, normalized to 100% at the maximum dose (Dmax), were ≤70% (extremely inhomogeneous dose, EIH); ≈80% (inhomogeneous dose, IH); and ≈90% (rather homogeneous dose, RH). VMARS plans were optimized using simple and similar cost functions. In particular, no dose constraint to the GTV Dmax was assigned to the EIH plans. Results Intended VMARS plans fulfilling the prerequisites were generated without problems for all GTVs of ≥10 mm, whereas 86.4% was the lowest IDS for the D98% for 5-mm GTV. Therefore, additional plans for 9- and 8-mm GTVs were generated, which resulted in 68.6% and 75.1% being the lowest IDSs for the D98% values of 9- and 8-mm GTVs, respectively. The EIH plans were the best in terms of the following: 1) dose conformity, i.e., minimum spillage of PD outside the GTV; 2) moderate, not too excessive, dose attenuation outside the GTV, i.e., appropriate marginal dose 2-mm outside the GTV boundary as a function of GTV size; and 3) lowest dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV. In contrast, the RH plans were the worst based on all of the aforementioned measures. Conclusions On the assumption of uniform dose assignment to the GTV margin, a very inhomogeneous GTV dose is basically the most suitable for SRS of BMs in terms of 1) superior dose conformity; 2) minimizing the dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV; and 3) moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV with a tumor volume-dependent rational increase, i.e., appropriate dose of the common PTV boundary. The concentrically laminated steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary for the EIH plan may also be advantageous for achieving superior tumor response, although early and excessive GTV shrinkage caused by the EIH plan during mfSRS can lead to surrounding brain injury.

Dose conformity and falloff in single‐lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods

Retrospective Quality Metrics Review of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans Treating Multiple Targets Using Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

A dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and dynamic conformal arc therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer using stereotactic body radiotherapy

Is High–dose Rate RapidArc-based Radiosurgery Dosimetrically Advantageous for the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors?

Comparison of three Radiotherapy Techniques Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Variable and Constant Dose Rate and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for the Irradiation of Five Cancer Sites

Effect of prescription isodose line on tissue sparing in linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery treating multiple brain metastases using dynamic conformal arcs

Treating early-stage centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer with DCAT-SBRT in centers lacking the VMAT technique: a comprehensive study

Comparison of Vmat and Imrt for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (sbrt) of the Adrenal Metastases

Dosimetric Comparison, Treatment Efficiency Estimation, and Biological Evaluation of Popular Stereotactic Radiosurgery Options in Treating Single Small Brain Metastasis

Approaches for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in brain metastases using different radiotherapy modalities (Feasibility study)

Comprehensive dosimetric planning comparison for early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer with SABR: fixed-beam IMRT versus VMAT versus TomoTherapy

An Extremely Inhomogeneous Gross Tumor Dose is Suitable for Volumetric Modulated Arc-Based Radiosurgery with a 5-mm Leaf-Width Multileaf Collimator for Single Brain Metastasis

Clinical Evaluation Of Rtog 0813 Dosimetric Criteria For Lung Sabr Using Iplan Monte Carlo Algorithm

Sub-arc Collimator Angle Optimization Based on the Conformity Index Heatmap for VMAT Planning of Multiple Brain Metastases SRS Treatments

Dosimetric Comparisons of Different Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Techniques in Treating Intracranial Tumors > 3 Cm in Longest Diameter

Evaluation of the Geometric and Dosimetric Accuracy of Synthetic Computed Tomography Images for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Stereotactic Radiosurgery

SU-E-T-564: Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer: A Treatment Planning Comparison among Fixed Field IMRT, Coplanar and Noncoplanar Arcs Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Dosimetric Comparisons of VMAT, IMRT and 3DCRT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Simultaneous Integrated Boost.

Dosimetric Superiority of Flattening Filter Free Beams for Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Single Brain Metastasis

Effect of modulation factor and low dose threshold level on gamma pass rates of single isocenter multi‐target SRT treatment plans

Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison with Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.