Pre‐excitation gradients for eddy current nulled convex optimized diffusion encoding (Pre‐ENCODE)

Matthew J. Middione,Michael Loecher,Xiaozhi Cao,Kawin Setsompop,Daniel B. Ennis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30068
2024-03-20
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Abstract:Purpose To evaluate the use of pre‐excitation gradients for eddy current–nulled convex optimized diffusion encoding (Pre‐ENCODE) to mitigate eddy current–induced image distortions in diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI). Methods DWI sequences using monopolar (MONO), ENCODE, and Pre‐ENCODE were evaluated in terms of the minimum achievable echo time (TE min ) and eddy current‐induced image distortions using simulations, phantom experiments, and in vivo DWI in volunteers (N=6 ). Results Pre‐ENCODE provided a shorter TE min than MONO (71.0 ± 17.7ms vs. 77.6 ± 22.9ms) and ENCODE (71.0 ± 17.7ms vs. 86.2 ± 14.2ms) in 100% of the simulated cases for a commercial 3T MRI system with b‐values ranging from 500 to 3000 s/mm 2 and in‐plane spatial resolutions ranging from 1.0 to 3.0mm 2 . Image distortion was estimated by intravoxel signal variance between diffusion encoding directions near the phantom edges and was significantly lower with Pre‐ENCODE than with MONO (10.1% vs. 22.7% , p=6−5 ) and comparable to ENCODE (10.1% vs. 10.4% , p=0.12 ). In vivo measurements of apparent diffusion coefficients were similar in global brain pixels (0.37 [0.28,1.45]×10−3 mm 2 /s vs. 0.38 [0.28,1.45]×10−3 mm 2 /s, p=0.25 ) and increased in edge brain pixels (0.80 [0.17,1.49]×10−3 mm 2 /s vs. 0.70 [0.18,1.48]×10−3 mm 2 /s, p=0.02 ) for MONO compared to Pre‐ENCODE. Conclusion Pre‐ENCODE mitigated eddy current–induced image distortions for diffusion imaging with a shorter TE min than MONO and ENCODE.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?