A comparison between novel Gd2Zr2O7 and Gd2Zr2O7/YSZ thermal barrier coatings fabricated by plasma spray-physical vapor deposition

Ren-Bo Zhu,Jian-Peng Zou,Jie Mao,Zi-Qian Deng,Xiao-Feng Zhang,Chun-Ming Deng,Min Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01534-x
IF: 6.318
2020-08-11
Rare Metals
Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">Spherical Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> hollow powders with a mean size of 8.8 μm were fabricated as feedstock for thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) by spray-drying. The single-ceramic-layer (SCL) Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> TBCs and double-ceramic-layer (DCL) Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub>/YSZ TBCs with quasi-columnar structure were successfully fabricated by plasma spray-physical vapor deposition (PS-PVD). Tensile and water-quenching tests were applied to evaluate TBCs performances. The results show that adhesion strength of SCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> TBCs and DCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub>/YSZ TBCs is 36.5 MPa and 15.4 MPa, respectively. The delamination of SCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> TBCs and DCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub>/YSZ TBCs in the tensile test takes place at the middle and bottom of Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> layer, respectively, due to relatively lower fracture toughness of Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> layer. After 40 cycles of water-quenching test, DCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub>/YSZ TBC surface keeps relatively intact, while SCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> TBC surface shows 20% visible destroyed regions, which demonstrates that DCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub>/YSZ TBCs have a better thermal shock resistance than SCL Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> TBCs. The cracks in the SCL system propagate near thermally grown oxide (TGO) due to thermal mismatch and TGO growing stress, while cracks in the DCL system propagate in the Gd<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>Zr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub> layer due to its relatively lower fracture toughness.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?