Abstract:Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species' declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a 'multilayer' network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities. In the face of the current biodiversity crisis, predicting how species loss will affect ecological communities is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies including only one type of ecological interactions (e.g. feeding or pollination) revealed the relevance of the structure of ecological networks for the persistence of ecological communities. However, there is mounting evidence that considering multiple interactions simultaneously can alter the results based on a single interaction. Here, we study the robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types to the loss of plant species, and we show that it is a combination of the robustness of the two bipartite ecological networks composing the ecological community. By analyzing networks from multiple communities, we are able to identify commonalities across interaction types, as well as singularities specific to a given interaction type, caused by underlying biological constraints. Our results highlight that a multi-interaction approach is crucial to better gauge the overall robustness of ecological communities, and to correctly determine the relative importance of different plants species at the whole community level, which can be key for biodiversity conservation.

On the structure of species-function participation in multilayer ecological networks

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

The Multilayer Nature of Ecological Networks

Assembly, Ecosystem Functions, and Stability in Species Interaction Networks

Invasive species modulate the structure and stability of a multilayer mutualistic network

Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations

Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecological communities

Unifying concepts of biological function from molecules to ecosystems

Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecosystems

Functional coexistence theory: a mechanistic framework linking biodiversity to ecosystem function

Jack-of-all-trades effects drive biodiversity–ecosystem multifunctionality relationships in European forests

How biotic interactions structure species' responses to perturbations

Cascading effects from plants to soil microorganisms explain how plant species richness and simulated climate change affect soil multifunctionality

Structural dynamics of plant-pollinator mutualistic networks

Ecological network complexity scales with area

Common Organizing Mechanisms in Ecological and Socio-economic Networks

Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space

Interaction network structure explains species' temporal persistence in empirical plant–pollinator communities

Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities

Bifurcations and multistability in empirical mutualistic networks

Local and regional processes drive distance decay in structure in a spatial multilayer plant-pollinator network