Abstract:Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species' declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a 'multilayer' network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities. In the face of the current biodiversity crisis, predicting how species loss will affect ecological communities is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies including only one type of ecological interactions (e.g. feeding or pollination) revealed the relevance of the structure of ecological networks for the persistence of ecological communities. However, there is mounting evidence that considering multiple interactions simultaneously can alter the results based on a single interaction. Here, we study the robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types to the loss of plant species, and we show that it is a combination of the robustness of the two bipartite ecological networks composing the ecological community. By analyzing networks from multiple communities, we are able to identify commonalities across interaction types, as well as singularities specific to a given interaction type, caused by underlying biological constraints. Our results highlight that a multi-interaction approach is crucial to better gauge the overall robustness of ecological communities, and to correctly determine the relative importance of different plants species at the whole community level, which can be key for biodiversity conservation.

Assembly, Ecosystem Functions, and Stability in Species Interaction Networks

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

Stability of multi-layer ecosystems

The assembly and dynamics of ecological communities in an ever‐changing world

Mutualism provides the basis for biodiversity in eco-evolutionary community assembly

Diverse interactions and ecosystem engineering stabilize community assembly

On the structure of species-function participation in multilayer ecological networks

Impact of network structure on a model of diffusion and competitive interaction

Community Assembly Processes in Fragmented Forests and Its Testing Methods

Opportunity, Challenge and Countermeasure for Studying Relationship among Multiple Ecosystem Services

Ecosystem Stability and Its Relationship with Biodiversity

Habitat Fragmentation Drives Plant Community Assembly Processes Across Life Stages.

Interspecific competition shapes the structural stability of mutualistic networks

Strengthening Insights in Microbial Ecological Networks from Theory to Applications

Conservation of Species- and Trait-Based Modeling Network Interactions in Extremely Acidic Microbial Community Assembly

Cooperative Network Dynamics

Structural stability determines evolutionary stability in mutualistic model ecosystems

Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities

Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities

Common Organizing Mechanisms in Ecological and Socio-economic Networks

Effects of Biodiversity on Functions and Stability of Ecosystem