Abstract:The ability to engage in goal-directed behavior despite exposure to stress is critical to resilience. Questions of how stress can impair or improve behavioral functioning are important in diverse settings, from athletic competitions to academic testing. Previous research suggests that controllability is a key factor in the impact of stress on behavior: learning how to control stressors buffers people from the negative effects of stress on subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. In addition, research suggests that the impact of stress on cognitive functioning depends on an individual's response to stressors: moderate responses to stress can lead to improved performance while extreme (high or low) responses can lead to impaired performance. The present studies tested the hypothesis that (1) learning to behaviorally control stressors leads to improved performance on a test of general executive functioning, the color-word Stroop, and that (2) this improvement emerges specifically for people who report moderate (subjective) responses to stress. Experiment 1: Stroop performance, measured before and after a stress manipulation, was compared across groups of undergraduate participants (n = 109). People who learned to control a noise stressor and received accurate performance feedback demonstrated reduced Stroop interference compared with people exposed to uncontrollable noise stress and feedback indicating an exaggerated rate of failure. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest reduction in Stroop interference. In contrast, in the group exposed to uncontrollable events, self-reported stress failed to predict performance. Experiment 2: In a second sample (n = 90), we specifically investigated the role of controllability by keeping the rate of failure feedback constant across groups. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest Stroop improvement. Once again, this pattern was not demonstrated in the group exposed to uncontrollable events. These results suggest that stress controllability and subjective response interact to affect high-level cognitive abilities. Specifically, exposure to moderate, controllable stress benefits performance, but exposure to uncontrollable stress or having a more extreme response to stress tends to harm performance. These findings may provide insights on how to leverage the beneficial effects of stress in a range of settings.

Inhibitory control and academic achievement - a study of the relationship between Stroop Effect and university students' academic performance

Male Internet addicts show impaired executive control ability: evidence from a color-word Stroop task.

The Influence Of Stimulant Material Category On The Stroop Dilution Effect

Inhibition changes across the lifespan: experimental evidence from the Stroop task

Mediating role of inhibitory control in relationships between cardiovascular fitness and academic achievement in preadolescents

Inhibitory control as a significant predictor of academic performance in Chinese high schoolers

Interference control in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: differential Stroop effects for colour-naming versus counting

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

Disentangling age and schooling effects on inhibitory control development: An fNIRS investigation

Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Measuring inhibitory control in children and adults: brain imaging and mental chronometry

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

Evaluating the Stroop Test With Older Adults: Construct Validity, Short Term Test-Retest Reliability, and Sensitivity to Mental Fatigue

The temporal dynamics of the Stroop effect from childhood to young and older adulthood

The Stroop Effect: an Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis in Healthy Young Adults.

The Color-Word Stroop Task Does Not Differentiate Cognitive Inhibition Ability Among Esports Gamers of Varying Expertise

Changes in pupil size track self-control failure

Resisting the urge to calculate: The relation between inhibitory control and perceptual cues in arithmetic performance

Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect

Aspects of attention and inhibitory control are associated with on-task classroom behaviour and behavioural assessments, by both teachers and parents, in children with high and low symptoms of ADHD