Abstract:The ability to engage in goal-directed behavior despite exposure to stress is critical to resilience. Questions of how stress can impair or improve behavioral functioning are important in diverse settings, from athletic competitions to academic testing. Previous research suggests that controllability is a key factor in the impact of stress on behavior: learning how to control stressors buffers people from the negative effects of stress on subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. In addition, research suggests that the impact of stress on cognitive functioning depends on an individual's response to stressors: moderate responses to stress can lead to improved performance while extreme (high or low) responses can lead to impaired performance. The present studies tested the hypothesis that (1) learning to behaviorally control stressors leads to improved performance on a test of general executive functioning, the color-word Stroop, and that (2) this improvement emerges specifically for people who report moderate (subjective) responses to stress. Experiment 1: Stroop performance, measured before and after a stress manipulation, was compared across groups of undergraduate participants (n = 109). People who learned to control a noise stressor and received accurate performance feedback demonstrated reduced Stroop interference compared with people exposed to uncontrollable noise stress and feedback indicating an exaggerated rate of failure. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest reduction in Stroop interference. In contrast, in the group exposed to uncontrollable events, self-reported stress failed to predict performance. Experiment 2: In a second sample (n = 90), we specifically investigated the role of controllability by keeping the rate of failure feedback constant across groups. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest Stroop improvement. Once again, this pattern was not demonstrated in the group exposed to uncontrollable events. These results suggest that stress controllability and subjective response interact to affect high-level cognitive abilities. Specifically, exposure to moderate, controllable stress benefits performance, but exposure to uncontrollable stress or having a more extreme response to stress tends to harm performance. These findings may provide insights on how to leverage the beneficial effects of stress in a range of settings.

Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

The detrimental effect of acute stress on response inhibition when exposed to acute stress: an event-related potential analysis.

Acute psychosocial stress modulates neural and behavioral substrates of cognitive control

Impact of Chronic Stress on Attention Control: Evidence from Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Analyses

EEG Evidence of Acute Stress Enhancing Inhibition Control by Increasing Attention

The effect of mild acute psychological stress on attention processing: an ERP study

The Association Between Experimentally Induced Stress, Performance Monitoring, and Response Inhibition: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis

Perceived control moderates the impact of academic stress on the attention process of working memory in male college students

Long-term Academic Stress Increases the Late Component of Error Processing: an ERP Study

The relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and inhibitory control following acute stress: An ERP study

The effect of chronic academic stress on intentional forgetting

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

Individual Differences under Acute Stress: Higher Cortisol Responders Performs Better on N-back Task in Young Men.

Acute stress selectively blunts reward anticipation but not consumption: An ERP study

The effects of long-term stress on neural dynamics of working memory processing: An investigation using ERP

Self-awareness protects working memory in people under chronic stress: An ERP study

Acute Psychological Stress Disrupts Attentional Bias to Threat-Related Stimuli

Stress-induced Reduction in Reward-Related Prefrontal Cortex Function

Long-term Academic Stress Enhances Early Processing of Facial Expressions.

Chronic Restraint Stress Did Not Alter Active Avoidance Coping or Neuronal Activation Levels of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex or the Nucleus Accumbens in Male Rats

Temporal stability and effect dynamics between executive functions, perceived chronic stress, and hair cortisol concentrations.