Abstract:The ability to engage in goal-directed behavior despite exposure to stress is critical to resilience. Questions of how stress can impair or improve behavioral functioning are important in diverse settings, from athletic competitions to academic testing. Previous research suggests that controllability is a key factor in the impact of stress on behavior: learning how to control stressors buffers people from the negative effects of stress on subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. In addition, research suggests that the impact of stress on cognitive functioning depends on an individual's response to stressors: moderate responses to stress can lead to improved performance while extreme (high or low) responses can lead to impaired performance. The present studies tested the hypothesis that (1) learning to behaviorally control stressors leads to improved performance on a test of general executive functioning, the color-word Stroop, and that (2) this improvement emerges specifically for people who report moderate (subjective) responses to stress. Experiment 1: Stroop performance, measured before and after a stress manipulation, was compared across groups of undergraduate participants (n = 109). People who learned to control a noise stressor and received accurate performance feedback demonstrated reduced Stroop interference compared with people exposed to uncontrollable noise stress and feedback indicating an exaggerated rate of failure. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest reduction in Stroop interference. In contrast, in the group exposed to uncontrollable events, self-reported stress failed to predict performance. Experiment 2: In a second sample (n = 90), we specifically investigated the role of controllability by keeping the rate of failure feedback constant across groups. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest Stroop improvement. Once again, this pattern was not demonstrated in the group exposed to uncontrollable events. These results suggest that stress controllability and subjective response interact to affect high-level cognitive abilities. Specifically, exposure to moderate, controllable stress benefits performance, but exposure to uncontrollable stress or having a more extreme response to stress tends to harm performance. These findings may provide insights on how to leverage the beneficial effects of stress in a range of settings.

Perceived control moderates the impact of academic stress on the attention process of working memory in male college students

Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Impact of Chronic Stress on Attention Control: Evidence from Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Analyses

EEG Evidence of Acute Stress Enhancing Inhibition Control by Increasing Attention

Self-awareness protects working memory in people under chronic stress: An ERP study

Individual Differences under Acute Stress: Higher Cortisol Responders Performs Better on N-back Task in Young Men.

The effects of long-term stress on neural dynamics of working memory processing: An investigation using ERP

Sense of control buffers against stress

Acute psychosocial stress modulates neural and behavioral substrates of cognitive control

Effect of acute stress on working memory in pilots: Investigating the modulatory role of memory load

How Society Anxiety Influences Attention Control in College Students: The Moderated Mediation Effect of Cognitive Flexibility and Resting-state Electroencephalography Activity

The Relationship Between Self-control and Psychological Stress among College Students

The effect of mild acute psychological stress on attention processing: an ERP study

Recent life stress predicts blunted acute stress response and the role of executive control

Long-term Academic Stress Increases the Late Component of Error Processing: an ERP Study

ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN DAILY STRESSOR CONTROL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

Long-term Academic Stress Enhances Early Processing of Facial Expressions.

The relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and inhibitory control following acute stress: An ERP study

The effect of chronic academic stress on intentional forgetting

Stress-induced Impairment Reveals the Stage and Features of Post-Error Adaptive Adjustment