Abstract:Abstract The goal of the current study was to interrogate aspects of the cascade-of-control model [Banich, M. T. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 89–94, 2009; Banich, M. T. The Stroop effect occurs at multiple points along a cascade of control: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2164, 2019], a neurocognitive model that posits how portions of pFC interact in a cascade-like manner to overcome interference from task-irrelevant information, and to test whether it could be used to predict individual differences in cognitive control outside the scanner. Participants (n = 62) completed two fMRI Word–Picture Stroop tasks, one containing emotional stimuli and one containing non-emotional stimuli, as well as a behavioral out-of-scanner Color–Word Stroop task at each of two time points. In a departure from the traditional approach of using a single task contrast to index neural activation across all ROIs, the current study utilized specific ROI by contrast pairings selected based on the specific level of control hypothesized by the cascade-of-control model to occur within that region. In addition, data across both tasks and both time points were combined to create composite measures of neural activation and of behavior. Consistent with the cascade-of-control model, individual differences in brain activation for specific contrasts within each of the three ROIs were associated with behavioral interference on the standard Color–Word Stroop task. Testing of alternative models revealed that these brain–behavior relationships were specific to the theoretically driven ROI by contrast pairings. Furthermore, such relationships were not observed across single-task and single-time point measures, but instead emerged from the composite measures. These findings provide evidence that brain activation observed across multiple regions of frontal cortex, each of which likely exerts cognitive control in a differential manner, is capable of predicting individual differences in behavioral performance.

The Stroop Effect: an Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis in Healthy Young Adults.

Functional MRI study of the neural mechanism of component processing during Stroop task performance

Cognitive Control Explored by Linear Modelling Behaviour and Fmri Data During Stroop Tasks

Stroop Effect Adjustment Mechanisms Studied Using Fmri

The temporal dynamics of the Stroop effect from childhood to young and older adulthood

An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task

Composite Measures of Brain Activation Predict Individual Differences in Behavioral Stroop Interference

Brain oscillations in cognitive control: A cross-sectional study with a spatial stroop task

A Fmri Study of Age-Related Differential Cortical Patterns During Cued Motor Movement

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Stroop Effect in Male Schizophrenic Patients

The Lifespan Trajectories of Brain Activities Related to Cognitive Control

Changes in neural mechanisms of cognitive control during the transition from late adolescence to young adulthood

Inhibition changes across the lifespan: experimental evidence from the Stroop task

Differential Responses in Human Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Changes in Object and Rule Relevance

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

Brain activation patterns in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment during working memory task: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

The Complex Pre-Execution Stage Of Auditory Cognitive Control: Erps Evidence From Stroop Tasks

The Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes in the Human Brain

Temporal dynamics analysis reveals that concurrent working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping