Abstract:During our daily life, we depend on memories of past experiences to plan future behaviour. These memories are represented by the activity of specific neuronal groups or ‘engrams’1,2. Neuronal engrams are assembled during learning by synaptic modification, and engram reactivation represents the memorized experience1. Engrams of conscious memories are initially stored in the hippocampus for several days and then transferred to cortical areas2. In the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, granule cells transform rich inputs from the entorhinal cortex into a sparse output, which is forwarded to the highly interconnected pyramidal cell network in hippocampal area CA33. This process is thought to support pattern separation4 (but see refs. 5,6). CA3 pyramidal neurons project to CA1, the hippocampal output region. Consistent with the idea of transient memory storage in the hippocampus, engrams in CA1 and CA2 do not stabilize over time7–10. Nevertheless, reactivation of engrams in the dentate gyrus can induce recall of artificial memories even after weeks2. Reconciliation of this apparent paradox will require recordings from dentate gyrus granule cells throughout learning, which has so far not been performed for more than a single day6,11,12. Here, we use chronic two-photon calcium imaging in head-fixed mice performing a multiple-day spatial memory task in a virtual environment to record neuronal activity in all major hippocampal subfields. Whereas pyramidal neurons in CA1–CA3 show precise and highly context-specific, but continuously changing, representations of the learned spatial sceneries in our behavioural paradigm, granule cells in the dentate gyrus have a spatial code that is stable over many days, with low place- or context-specificity. Our results suggest that synaptic weights along the hippocampal trisynaptic loop are constantly reassigned to support the formation of dynamic representations in downstream hippocampal areas based on a stable code provided by the dentate gyrus.

False memories in cuttlefish

Episodic-like memory is preserved with age in cuttlefish

Creating emotional false recollections: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency mechanisms.

Introduction to the special issue: the neuroscience of false memory

Investigating the neural basis of schematic false memories by examining schematic and lure pattern similarity

False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?

Epigenetic repression of cFos supports sequential formation of distinct spatial memories

Memory formation in the absence of experience

Parallel emergence of stable and dynamic memory engrams in the hippocampus

A few seemingly harmless routes to a false memory

Neurophysiological Correlates of Memory Illusion in Both Encoding and Retrieval Phases

Short-Term Phantom Recollection in 8-10-Year-Olds and Young Adults

Anterior Hippocampal Engagement during Memory Formation Predicts Subsequent False Recognition of Similar Experiences

What Can False Memory Tell Us about Memory Impairments in Alzheimer’s Disease?

The Adaptive Characteristics of Memory: A Perspective from the Life-Span Development of Associative Memory Illusion

Motivated False Memory

What Happened When? Cerebral Processing of Modified Structure and Content in Episodic Cueing

Validation of a rodent model of episodic memory replay

Concerns about confounds: False memory as an explanation for a hippocampus-supported implicit eye-movement-based relational memory effect

Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions