Abstract:The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest , and pillow ) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

Neurophysiological Correlates of Memory Illusion in Both Encoding and Retrieval Phases

The Effects of Detected Relationship Between List Items and Critical Lures on False Memories

"I heard it before ... or not": time-course of ERP response and behavioural correlates associated with false recognition memory

Differential Neural Correlates Underlie Judgment of Learning and Subsequent Memory Performance

False (or biased) memory: Emotion and working memory capacity effects in the DRM paradigm

A study of EEG non-stationarity on inducing false memory in different emotional states

Multiple Interactive Memory Representations Underlie the Induction of False Memory

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms Underlying False Memory: an Information Processing Perspective

A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples

Semantic and episodic processes differently predict false memories in the DRM task

Comparison of semantic and phonological false memories in short- and long-term tests

Emotional false memories: the impact of response bias under speeded retrieval conditions

The Neural Correlates of Context Retrieval in False Recognition

Neural Global Pattern Similarity Underlies True and False Memories.

The Effect of Test Context on False Memory

The influence of positive emotion and negative emotion on false memory based on EEG signal analysis

Reality monitoring and metacognitive judgments in a false-memory paradigm

Cross-cultural comparison of the neural correlates of true and false memory retrieval

Transcranial direct current stimulation over the left anterior temporal lobe during memory retrieval differentially affects true and false recognition in the DRM task

The Relationship Between DRM and Misinformation False Memories