Abstract:The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest , and pillow ) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

A few seemingly harmless routes to a false memory

Introduction to the special issue: the neuroscience of false memory

Motivated False Memory

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?

Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.

Creating emotional false recollections: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency mechanisms.

Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?

Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study

Emotion and false memory: How goal-irrelevance can be relevant for what people remember

When Imagination Feels Like Reality: A Case Study of False Memories and Maladaptive Daydreaming in Visual Impairment

A Study on False Memory Induced by Misleading Information

What Can False Memory Tell Us about Memory Impairments in Alzheimer’s Disease?

Self-referential false associations: A self-enhanced constructive effect for verbal but not pictorial stimuli

How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?

Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort Recollection

Lying on misleading information: false confirmation leads to memory errors

False memories in music listening: exploring the misinformation effect and individual difference factors in auditory memory

The power of emotion versus the power of suggestion: Memory for emotional events in the misinformation paradigm.

Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us

Who is susceptible in three false memory tasks?