Abstract:Given the limitations of using the Cox hazard ratio to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect, alternative measures that do not have these limitations are gaining attention. One of the recently proposed alternative methods uses the average hazard with survival weight (AH). This population quantity can be interpreted as the average intensity of the event occurrence in a given time window that does not involve study-specific censoring. Inference procedures for the ratio of AH and difference in AH have already been proposed in simple randomized controlled trial settings to compare two groups. However, methods with stratification factors have not been well discussed, although stratified analysis is often used in practice to adjust for confounding factors and increase the power to detect a between-group difference. The conventional stratified analysis or meta-analysis approach, which integrates stratum-specific treatment effects using an optimal weight, directly applies to the ratio of AH and difference in AH. However, this conventional approach has significant limitations similar to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method for a binary outcome and the stratified Cox procedure for a time-to-event outcome. To address this, we propose a new stratified analysis method for AH using standardization. With the proposed method, one can summarize the between-group treatment effect in both absolute difference and relative terms, adjusting for stratification factors. This can be a valuable alternative to the traditional stratified Cox procedure to estimate and report the magnitude of the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes using hazard.

The weighted log-rank tests based on stratified clustered survival data: saddle-point p-values and confidence intervals

P-values and confidence intervals for weighted log-rank tests under truncated binomial design based on clustered medical data

Log-rank tests for censored clustered data under generalized randomized block design: Saddlepoint approximation

Saddlepoint approximation for weighted log-rank tests based on block truncated binomial design

More powerful logrank permutation tests for two-sample survival data

A Class of Weighted Log-Rank Tests for Survival Data when the Event is Rare

Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial

Stratified modestly-weighted log-rank tests in settings with an anticipated delayed separation of survival curves

P-values and confidence intervals of linear rank tests for left-truncated data under truncated binomial design

Partitioned Log-Rank Tests for the Overall Homogeneity of Hazard Rate Functions

Optimality of testing procedures for survival data

The Inverse Log-Rank Test: A Versatile Procedure for Late Separating Survival Curves

A Novel Stratified Analysis Method for Testing and Estimating Overall Treatment Effects on Time-to-Event Outcomes Using Average Hazard with Survival Weight

Weighted Rank Tests for Noninferiority Hypotheses Based on Paired Survival Times

Covariate-adjusted Group Sequential Comparisons of Survival Probabilities

Studentized Permutation Method for Comparing Two Restricted Mean Survival Times with Small Sample from Randomized Trials.

Supplementary Figure S4 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation

Studentized Permutation Method for Comparing Restricted Mean Survival Times with Small Sample from Randomized Trials

Two-sample survival tests based on control arm summary statistics

Linear Regression Analysis of Censored Survival Data Based on Rank Tests

Robust Tests for Treatment Effect in Survival Analysis under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization