Abstract:Clinical Trials, Ahead of Print. Background/aimsFor cancers with low incidence, low event rates, and a time-to-event endpoint, a randomized non-inferiority trial designed based on the logrank test can require a large sample size with significantly prolonged enrollment duration, making such a non-inferiority trial not feasible. This article evaluates a design based on a non-inferiority test of proportions, compares its required sample size to the non-inferiority logrank test, assesses whether there are scenarios for which a non-inferiority test of proportions can be more efficient, and provides guidelines in usage of a non-inferiority test of proportions.MethodsThis article describes the sample size calculation for a randomized non-inferiority trial based on a non-inferiority logrank test or a non-inferiority test of proportions. The sample size required by the two design methods are compared for a wide range of scenarios, varying the underlying Weibull survival functions, the non-inferiority margin, and loss to follow-up rate.ResultsOur results showed that there are scenarios for which the non-inferiority test of proportions can have significantly reduced sample size. Specifically, the non-inferiority test of proportions can be considered for cancers with more than 80% long-term survival rate. We provide guidance in choice of this design approach based on parameters of the Weibull survival functions, the non-inferiority margin, and loss to follow-up rate.ConclusionFor cancers with low incidence and low event rates, a non-inferiority trial based on the logrank test is not feasible due to its large required sample size and prolonged enrollment duration. The use of a non-inferiority test of proportions can make a randomized non-inferiority Phase III trial feasible.

Saddlepoint approximation for weighted log-rank tests based on block truncated binomial design

P-values and confidence intervals for weighted log-rank tests under truncated binomial design based on clustered medical data

Log-rank tests for censored clustered data under generalized randomized block design: Saddlepoint approximation

The weighted log-rank tests based on stratified clustered survival data: saddle-point p-values and confidence intervals

Saddlepoint p-values for a class of location-scale tests under randomized block design

P-values and confidence intervals of linear rank tests for left-truncated data under truncated binomial design

Quantile Regression Based on the Weighted Approach with Dependent Truncated Data

More powerful logrank permutation tests for two-sample survival data

Statistical Inference of the Class of Nonparametric Tests for the Panel Count and Current Status Data from the Perspective of the Saddlepoint Approximation

A Class of Weighted Log-Rank Tests for Survival Data when the Event is Rare

Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome

Saddlepoint approximations to score test statistics in logistic regression for analyzing genome-wide association studies

Approximating Partial Likelihood Estimators via Optimal Subsampling

Saddlepoint p-values for a class of location-scale tests

Saddlepoint approximation of the p-values for the multivariate one-sample sign and signed-rank tests

Saddlepoint approximations for likelihood ratio like statistics with applications to permutation tests

A new approach for approximating the p-value of a class of bivariate sign tests

A Nonparametric Global Win Probability Approach to the Analysis and Sizing of Randomized Controlled Trials With Multiple Endpoints of Different Scales and Missing Data: Beyond O'Brien–Wei–Lachin

Using non-inferiority test of proportions in design of randomized non-inferiority trials with time-to-event endpoint with a focus on low-event-rate setting

A modified Friedman test for randomized complete block designs

Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial