Optimality of testing procedures for survival data

Andrea Arfé,Brian Alexander,Lorenzo Trippa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.00161

2020-05-27

Abstract:Most statistical tests for treatment effects used in randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes are based on the proportional hazards assumption, which often fails in practice. Data from early exploratory studies may provide evidence of non-proportional hazards which can guide the choice of alternative tests in the design of practice-changing confirmatory trials. We study a test to detect treatment effects in a late-stage trial which accounts for the deviations from proportional hazards suggested by early-stage data. Conditional on early-stage data, among all tests which control the frequentist Type I error rate at a fixed $\alpha$ level, our testing procedure maximizes the Bayesian prediction of the finite-sample power. Hence, the proposed test provides a useful benchmark for other tests commonly used in presence of non-proportional hazards, for example weighted log-rank tests. We illustrate the approach in a simulations based on data from a published cancer immunotherapy phase III trial.

Statistics Theory,Methodology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to design a statistical test method to detect treatment effects in late - stage clinical trials under the non - proportional hazards assumption. Most statistical test methods for survival analysis are based on the proportional hazards assumption, but in practical applications this assumption is often not valid, resulting in poor performance of these methods. The paper proposes a new test method. This method can maximize the Bayesian predictive probability in consideration of the deviation of the proportional hazards assumption revealed by early - stage research data, thereby more effectively detecting treatment effects in late - stage trials. This method is not only applicable to survival data, but also can improve the power of the test while controlling the type I error rate, especially in the presence of non - proportional hazards. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this method through simulation experiments and compares it with other commonly used methods.