Abstract:In their Comment, Wei et al. (arXiv:1809.08360v1 [cs.LG]) claim that our original interpretation of Diffractive Deep Neural Networks (D2NN) represent a mischaracterization of the system due to linearity and passivity. In this Response, we detail how this mischaracterization claim is unwarranted and oblivious to several sections detailed in our original manuscript (Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aat8084) that specifically introduced and discussed optical nonlinearities and reconfigurability of D2NNs, as part of our proposed framework to enhance its performance. To further refute the mischaracterization claim of Wei et al., we, once again, demonstrate the depth feature of optical D2NNs by showing that multiple diffractive layers operating collectively within a D2NN present additional degrees-of-freedom compared to a single diffractive layer to achieve better classification accuracy, as well as improved output signal contrast and diffraction efficiency as the number of diffractive layers increase, showing the deepness of a D2NN, and its inherent depth advantage for improved performance. In summary, the Comment by Wei et al. does not provide an amendment to the original teachings of our original manuscript, and all of our results, core conclusions and methodology of research reported in Science (DOI: 10.1126/science.aat8084) remain entirely valid.

Optical precursors in the singular and weak dispersion limits: Reply to reply to comment

Comment on "Direct Observation of Optical Precursors in a Region of Anomalous Dispersion"

Comment on "Observation of dark pulse in a dispersion-managed fiber ring laser"

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article “ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering”: comment

Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Comments on "Recent Developments in Plasmon-Assisted Photocatalysis -- a Personal Perspective"

Response to Comment on "All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks"

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Comment on "spatial Coherence and Optical Beam Shifts"

Reply to Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3244v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3244v1">arXiv:0810.3244v1</a>] by R.S. Decca et al. on "Contribution of drifting carriers to the Casimir-Lifshitz and Casimir-Polder interactions with semiconductor materials"

Comment on "Optical torque on small chiral particles in generic optical fields "

Reply to Comment by K. Forbes on "The super-chirality of vector twisted light" by M. Babiker, J. Yuan, K. Koksal and V. E. Lembessis; Optics Communications 554, 130185 (2024)

Comment on "Optical solitons for 2D-NLSE in multimode fiber with Kerr nonlinearity and its modulation instability"

Enhanced optical precursors by Doppler effect via active Raman gain process: erratum

Reply to "Comment on 'Anisotropic Scattering Caused by Apical Oxygen Vacancies in Thin Films of Overdoped High Temperature Cuprate Superconductors'"

Low-noise soliton molecule generation with an in-phase controllable pulse number by third- and second-order dispersion compensation in an all-fiber erbium-doped oscillator: publisher's note

Reducibility of Gene Patterns in Ciliates using the Breakpoint Graph

Optical feedback noise-immune cavity-enhanced optical heterodyne molecular spectrometry for sub-Doppler-broadened detection of C_2H_2: publisher's note

Comment on "Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit"

Comment on "Spectral Signatures of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov Order Parameter in One-Dimensional Optical lattices"