An Elemental Ethics for Artificial Intelligence: Water as Resistance Within AI's Value Chain

Sebastian Lehuede
2024-03-11
Abstract:Research and activism have increasingly denounced the problematic environmental record of the infrastructure and value chain underpinning Artificial Intelligence (AI). Water-intensive data centres, polluting mineral extraction and e-waste dumping are incontrovertibly part of AI's footprint. In this article, I turn to areas affected by AI-fuelled environmental harm and identify an ethics of resistance emerging from local activists, which I term 'elemental ethics'. Elemental ethics interrogates the AI value chain's problematic relationship with the elements that make up the world, critiques the undermining of local and ancestral approaches to nature and reveals the vital and quotidian harms engendered by so-called intelligent systems. While this ethics is emerging from grassroots and Indigenous groups, it echoes recent calls from environmental philosophy to reconnect with the environment via the elements. In empirical terms, this article looks at groups in Chile resisting a Google data centre project in Santiago and lithium extraction (used for rechargeable batteries) in Lickan Antay Indigenous territory, Atacama Desert. As I show, elemental ethics can complement top-down, utilitarian and quantitative approaches to AI ethics and sustainable AI as well as interrogate whose lived experience and well-being counts in debates on AI extinction.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and value chains on the environment, especially on water resources, and proposes an ethical framework - "elemental ethics" - based on the practical experiences of local communities and indigenous groups. Specifically, the author focuses on the following aspects: 1. **The impact of AI infrastructure on the environment**: - The paper points out that the development of AI depends on infrastructure such as data processing centers and mineral extraction, which consume a large amount of water resources and cause environmental pollution. For example, data centers need a large amount of water to cool servers, and lithium mining exacerbates the water shortage problem in arid areas. 2. **The voices and knowledge of the affected communities**: - The author emphasizes that current discussions on AI ethics and technological sustainability often overlook the voices and knowledge of those communities directly affected by AI infrastructure. By studying the Google data center project in Santiago, Chile, and the lithium mining cases in the Atacama Desert, the author shows how local residents and indigenous people oppose the construction of these projects from the perspective of protecting water resources. 3. **Proposing the "elemental ethics" framework**: - The author proposes "elemental ethics", an ethical framework that re - thinks the relationship between humans and the environment from the perspective of natural elements (such as water, fire, air, land). This ethics not only criticizes the practice of regarding natural resources as exploitable resources but also emphasizes the sense of responsibility for the land and the community, as well as respect for traditional lifestyles and cultural values. 4. **Criticizing the limitations of existing AI ethics and sustainability discussions**: - The paper criticizes that the existing discussions on AI ethics and technological sustainability focus too much on technical issues (such as privacy, fairness) and overlook the broader social and environmental context. In addition, the author also points out that some so - called "green AI" initiatives may be only short - term solutions and cannot truly solve the fundamental problems. In summary, this paper aims to provide a more inclusive and sustainable ethical framework for the design and development of AI by introducing the concept of "elemental ethics", especially by attaching importance to the needs and visions of those communities most affected by AI infrastructure.