The Ethics of AI and Geographic Information Technologies

Isaac Oluoch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13030087

IF: 3.4

2024-03-10

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information

Abstract:Over the past two decades, there has been increasing research on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and geographic information technologies for monitoring and mapping varying phenomena on the Earth's surface. At the same time, there has been growing attention given to the ethical challenges that these technologies present (both individually and collectively in fields such as critical cartography, ethics of AI and GeoAI). This attention has produced a growing number of critical commentaries and articles as well as guidelines (by academic, governmental, and private institutions) that have been drafted to raise these ethical challenges and suggest potential solutions. This paper presents a review of 16 ethical guidelines of AI and 8 guidelines of geographic information technologies, analysing how these guidelines define and employ a number of ethical values and principles (e.g., autonomy, bias, privacy, and consent)One of the key findings from this review is the asymmetrical mentioning of certain values and principles within the guidelines. The AI guidelines make very clear the potential of AI to negatively impact social and environmental justice, autonomy, fairness and dignity, while far less attention is given to these impacts in the geographic information guidelines. This points to a need for the geo-information guidelines to be more attentive to the role geographic information can play in disempowering individuals and groups.

geography, physical,remote sensing,computer science, information systems

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the challenges faced by artificial intelligence (AI) and geographic information technology at the ethical level. Specifically, the authors reviewed 16 AI ethics guidelines and 8 geographic information technology ethics guidelines, analyzing how these guidelines define and apply a range of ethical values and principles (such as autonomy, bias, privacy, and consent). The paper points out that AI ethics guidelines explicitly highlight the potential negative impacts of AI on social and environmental justice, autonomy, fairness, and dignity, whereas geographic information ethics guidelines pay less attention to these impacts. This suggests that geographic information ethics guidelines need to place more emphasis on the potential adverse effects of geographic information on individuals and groups.

The paper explores this issue in detail through the following points:
1. **Ethical Challenges**: By combining humanitarian mapping cases involving AI and geographic information technology, particularly mapping slums and informal settlements, the paper demonstrates the ethical challenges brought by these technologies. For example, technical biases and uncertainties may lead to biased mapping results, which in turn affect the representation and social status of communities.
2. **Ethical Framework**: The paper analyzes the application of selected ethical values and principles in AI and geographic information technology, revealing overlaps and differences between different guidelines. For instance, values such as explainability, fairness, autonomy, dignity, and justice receive more attention in AI guidelines, while they are relatively less emphasized in geographic information guidelines.
3. **Methodology**: Through literature analysis and keyword searches, 19 ethical values and principles were selected, and the distribution of these terms in 24 guidelines was assessed.

In summary, the paper aims to reveal the differences in ethical focus between AI and geographic information technology by comparing their ethical guidelines and suggests that geographic information ethics guidelines should more comprehensively consider potential negative impacts.