M.F. de-Lima-Santos,W.N. Yeung,T. Dodds
Abstract:With the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the news industry, media organizations have begun publishing guidelines that aim to promote the responsible, ethical, and unbiased implementation of AI-based technologies. These guidelines are expected to serve journalists and media workers by establishing best practices and a framework that helps them navigate ever-evolving AI tools. Drawing on institutional theory and digital inequality concepts, this study analyzes 37 AI guidelines for media purposes in 17 countries. Our analysis reveals key thematic areas, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and the preservation of journalistic values. Results highlight shared principles and best practices that emerge from these guidelines, including the importance of human oversight, explainability of AI systems, disclosure of automated content, and protection of user data. However, the geographical distribution of these guidelines, highlighting the dominance of Western nations, particularly North America and Europe, can further ongoing concerns about power asymmetries in AI adoption and consequently isomorphism outside these regions. Our results may serve as a resource for news organizations, policymakers, and stakeholders looking to navigate the complex AI development toward creating a more inclusive and equitable digital future for the media industry worldwide.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the extensive examination of artificial intelligence (AI) guidelines in global media, particularly focusing on responsible, ethical, and unbiased AI technology implementation in the news industry. As the adoption of AI in the news industry grows, media organizations have started to publish these guidelines to establish best practices and frameworks to assist journalists and media practitioners in dealing with evolving AI tools. The research is based on institutional theory and the concept of digital inequality, analyzing 37 AI media guidelines from 17 countries.
The study found that the key themes emphasized in these guidelines include transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and upholding journalistic values. The shared principles include the importance of human supervision, explainability of AI systems, disclosure of automated content, and protection of user data. However, the geographical distribution of the guidelines is primarily concentrated in Western countries, particularly North America and Europe, which may exacerbate power imbalances and regional homogenization in the adoption of AI.
The research poses three research questions:
1. How does the media industry address AI, particularly the growing presence of generative AI, in guidelines concerning ethical factors such as fairness, privacy, reliability, and transparency?
2. How do media organizations institutionalize values through AI guidelines to address the challenges brought by these technologies in the news industry while maintaining a commitment to journalistic principles and adapting to a constantly changing media environment?
3. How does the dominant position of Western countries in AI development and utilization affect the global adoption and institutionalization of AI-related principles in Southern countries?
The paper also discusses how digital inequality and disparities impact the media industry, highlighting the challenges faced by non-Western countries in AI development and application, including technology access, infrastructure, education, and skill gaps. Additionally, the study emphasizes the potential for economic inequality, data privacy and sovereignty issues, as well as AI bias and discrimination in the news industry.
The theoretical framework of the paper combines institutional theory and the concept of the digital divide to understand how the application of AI in the news industry reflects and influences global trends, as well as the adaptation and strategies of non-Western countries in addressing these challenges. The research methodology includes data collection and mixed methods design, analyzing AI media guidelines from different countries to uncover how these guidelines address ethical and responsibility issues related to AI in journalistic practices.