Worldwide AI Ethics: a review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance

Nicholas Kluge Corrêa,Camila Galvão,James William Santos,Carolina Del Pino,Edson Pontes Pinto,Camila Barbosa,Diogo Massmann,Rodrigo Mambrini,Luiza Galvão,Edmund Terem,Nythamar de Oliveira
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100857
2024-02-19
Abstract:The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) applications has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, bringing forth numerous benefits and conveniences. However, this expansion has also provoked ethical concerns, such as privacy breaches, algorithmic discrimination, security and reliability issues, transparency, and other unintended consequences. To determine whether a global consensus exists regarding the ethical principles that should govern AI applications and to contribute to the formation of future regulations, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of 200 governance policies and ethical guidelines for AI usage published by public bodies, academic institutions, private companies, and civil society organizations worldwide. We identified at least 17 resonating principles prevalent in the policies and guidelines of our dataset, released as an open-source database and tool. We present the limitations of performing a global scale analysis study paired with a critical analysis of our findings, presenting areas of consensus that should be incorporated into future regulatory efforts. All components tied to this work can be found in <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://nkluge-correa.github.io/worldwide_AI-ethics/" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to determine whether there is a global consensus on ethical principles regarding artificial intelligence (AI) applications and to provide support for the formulation of future regulations. Specifically, by analyzing 200 governance policies and ethical guidelines issued by public institutions, academic institutions, private companies, and civil society organizations, the research aims to identify the ethical principles prevalent in these policies and guidelines and explore the applicability and standardization challenges of these principles in different cultures and contexts. In addition, the paper also explores the limitations existing in current AI ethical documents, such as being superficial in practical applications, lacking binding force, and insufficient attention to certain key issues (such as labor rights, technological unemployment, militarized AI, etc.). Through these analyses, the research hopes to provide valuable references and suggestions for future AI ethical supervision.