Abstract:Recently, many AI researchers and practitioners have embarked on research visions that involve doing AI for "Good". This is part of a general drive towards infusing AI research and practice with ethical thinking. One frequent theme in current ethical guidelines is the requirement that AI be good for all, or: contribute to the Common Good. But what is the Common Good, and is it enough to want to be good? Via four lead questions, I will illustrate challenges and pitfalls when determining, from an AI point of view, what the Common Good is and how it can be enhanced by AI. The questions are: What is the problem / What is a problem?, Who defines the problem?, What is the role of knowledge?, and What are important side effects and dynamics? The illustration will use an example from the domain of "AI for Social Good", more specifically "Data Science for Social Good". Even if the importance of these questions may be known at an abstract level, they do not get asked sufficiently in practice, as shown by an exploratory study of 99 contributions to recent conferences in the field. Turning these challenges and pitfalls into a positive recommendation, as a conclusion I will draw on another characteristic of computer-science thinking and practice to make these impediments visible and attenuate them: "attacks" as a method for improving design. This results in the proposal of ethics pen-testing as a method for helping AI designs to better contribute to the Common Good.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper mainly explores the challenges and pitfalls faced by artificial intelligence (AI) in the pursuit of the "Common Good". Specifically, the author analyzes how to define and achieve the public good from the perspective of AI through four guiding questions: 1. **What is the problem?** 2. **Who defines the problem?** 3. **What is the role of knowledge?** 4. **What are the important side - effects and dynamics?** These questions aim to reveal the complexity and difficulties that may be encountered in the pursuit of the public good in practice. The following are the specific contents of these challenges: #### 1. What is the problem? In the field of AI, many research and applications aim to solve certain social problems. However, determining what the "problem" is in itself is a complex process. Different stakeholders may have different views on the same phenomenon, so it is necessary to clarify which problems really need to be solved. #### 2. Who defines the problem? Different groups may have different understandings of the "public good". Therefore, who has the right to define what the public good is and how to define it is a key issue. This involves the participation and negotiation process of stakeholders. #### 3. What is the role of knowledge? The core of AI and data science is to process and analyze data to generate knowledge. However, the way knowledge is generated and used will directly affect the realization of the public good. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the role that knowledge plays in this process. #### 4. What are the important side - effects and dynamics? The application of any technology may bring unexpected consequences. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the side - effects and long - term impacts that AI technology may produce in practical applications to ensure that it will not damage the public good. ### Main contributions of the paper By raising the above four questions, the author reveals the ethical dilemmas existing in current AI research and practice, and proposes "ethics pen - testing" as a method to help AI design better contribute to the public good. This method draws on the concept of penetration testing in computer science and discovers and improves potential problems in the design through simulated attacks. ### Conclusion This paper emphasizes that in the process of pursuing AI to serve the public good, these complex problems must be deeply considered and solved. Only in this way can we ensure that AI technology truly benefits all people, not just a part of them.

AI for the Common Good?! Pitfalls, challenges, and Ethics Pen-Testing

How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors

Becoming Good at AI for Good

AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Risks

Ethics in the Age of AI: Research of the Intersection of Technology, Morality, and Society

Responsible (use of) AI

Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good

Good AI for the Present of Humanity Democratizing AI Governance

Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices

AI-Ethics by Design. Evaluating Public Perception on the Importance of Ethical Design Principles of AI

Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence

AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps

AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers

From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices

Artificial intelligence ethics by design. Evaluating public perception on the importance of ethical design principles of artificial intelligence

Shaping AI's Impact on Billions of Lives

AI virtues -- The missing link in putting AI ethics into practice

Politics by Automatic Means? A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Ethics at Work

Developing and Evaluating a Design Method for Positive Artificial Intelligence

AI Challenges for Society and Ethics

The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices