Abstract:Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly influential in most people’s lives. This raises many philosophical questions. One is what responsibility we have as individuals to guide the development of AI in a desirable direction. More specifically, how should this responsibility be distributed among individuals and between individuals and other actors? We investigate this question from the perspectives of five principles of distribution that dominate the discussion about responsibility in connection with climate change: effectiveness, equality, desert, need, and ability. Since much is already written about these distributions in that context, we believe much can be gained if we can make use of this discussion also in connection with AI. Our most important findings are: (1) Different principles give different answers depending on how they are interpreted but, in many cases, different interpretations and different principles agree and even strengthen each other. If for instance ‘equality-based distribution’ is interpreted in a consequentialist sense, effectiveness, and through it, ability, will play important roles in the actual distributions, but so will an equal distribution as such, since we foresee that an increased responsibility of underrepresented groups will make the risks and benefits of AI more equally distributed. The corresponding reasoning is true for need-based distribution. (2) If we acknowledge that someone has a certain responsibility, we also have to acknowledge a corresponding degree of influence for that someone over the matter in question. (3) Independently of which distribution principle we prefer, ability cannot be dismissed. Ability is not fixed, however and if one of the other distributions is morally required, we are also morally required to increase the ability of those less able to take on the required responsibility.

The Role of Social Movements, Coalitions, and Workers in Resisting Harmful Artificial Intelligence and Contributing to the Development of Responsible AI

Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence

Analyzing the Contribution of Ethical Charters to Building the Future of Artificial Intelligence Governance

How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework

A Human Rights-Based Approach to Responsible AI

Shaping AI's Impact on Billions of Lives

In Oxford Handbook on AI Governance: The Role of Workers in AI Ethics and Governance

Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges

Artificial Tikkun Olam: AI Can Be Our Best Friend in Building an Open Human-Computer Society

Artificial Intelligence, Social Responsibility, and the Roles of the University

AI Challenges for Society and Ethics

The future of AI in our hands? To what extent are we as individuals morally responsible for guiding the development of AI in a desirable direction?

The Ethics of AI: Navigating the Moral Dilemmas of Artificial Intelligence

Tensions Between the Proxies of Human Values in AI

Towards a Responsible AI Development Lifecycle: Lessons From Information Security

AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Risks

Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI

A+AI: Threats to Society, Remedies, and Governance

The Social Contract for AI

AI and Social Impact

Managing workplace AI risks and the future of work