Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI

Jamie Bernardi,Gabriel Mukobi,Hilary Greaves,Lennart Heim,Markus Anderljung

2024-05-17

Abstract:Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse. However, this approach becomes less feasible as the number of developers of advanced AI grows, and impedes beneficial use-cases as well as harmful ones. In response, we urge a complementary approach: increasing societal adaptation to advanced AI, that is, reducing the expected negative impacts from a given level of diffusion of a given AI capability. We introduce a conceptual framework which helps identify adaptive interventions that avoid, defend against and remedy potentially harmful uses of AI systems, illustrated with examples in election manipulation, cyberterrorism, and loss of control to AI decision-makers. We discuss a three-step cycle that society can implement to adapt to AI. Increasing society's ability to implement this cycle builds its resilience to advanced AI. We conclude with concrete recommendations for governments, industry, and third-parties.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to address the social risks brought about by the spread of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Specifically, existing strategies for managing advanced AI risks usually focus on influencing the way AI systems are developed and their diffusion paths. However, as the number of developers of advanced AI increases, this capability - modifying - based approach becomes increasingly infeasible and, while limiting harmful applications, also hinders beneficial ones.

Therefore, the authors propose a complementary approach: **enhancing society's adaptability to advanced AI**, that is, reducing the expected negative impacts brought about by the spread of specific AI capabilities. By introducing a conceptual framework, the authors help identify adaptive interventions that can avoid, defend against, and remediate potentially harmful AI uses. The paper also discusses a three - step cycle that a society can implement to adapt to AI development, thereby enhancing society's resilience to advanced AI.

### Main content of the paper

1. **Introduction**
- The spread of advanced AI systems brings benefits and risks and requires careful governance.
- Existing risk management systems mainly focus on modifying AI capabilities, but this approach has become impractical and limits beneficial applications.

2. **The need for society to adapt to advanced AI**
- **Declining effectiveness of the capability - modification approach**: As the development cost decreases, more participants are able to train advanced AI systems, making the capability - modification - only approach less effective.
- **Safeguards are not foolproof**: Although some models are deployed with safety measures, these measures may be removed or bypassed.
- **The adaptive approach promotes beneficial diffusion**: Social adaptation can promote the beneficial diffusion of AI capabilities and support open development.

3. **Conceptual framework for AI adaptation**
- Propose a causal chain to describe how AI systems cause negative impacts.
- Categorize interventions as:
- **Capability - modification interventions**: Intervene during the development and diffusion stages.
- **Adaptive interventions**: Intervene during the use, initial harm, and impact stages, including avoidance, defense, and remediation measures.

4. **Specific examples of adapting to AI risks**
- **Election manipulation**: Use generative AI to create synthetic media, mislead voters, and undermine the fairness of elections.
- **Cyber - terrorism attacks on critical infrastructure**: AI - assisted non - state actors attack critical infrastructure, causing significant losses.
- **Loss of control over AI decision - makers**: Rely on AI for high - risk decisions, which may lead to catastrophic consequences.

5. **Conclusions and recommendations**
- Propose specific policy recommendations, including actions that governments, industries, academia, and non - profit organizations should take to enhance society's adaptability to advanced AI.

Through these contents, the paper emphasizes the importance of social adaptation in dealing with advanced AI risks and provides a practical framework to guide the design and implementation of relevant interventions.