Beyond Accidents and Misuse: Decoding the Structural Risk Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence

Kyle A Kilian

2024-08-16

Abstract:The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across contemporary industries is not just a technological upgrade but a transformation with profound structural implications. This paper explores the concept of structural risks associated with the rapid integration of advanced AI systems across social, economic, and political systems. This framework challenges the conventional perspectives that primarily focus on direct AI threats such as accidents and misuse and suggests that these more proximate risks are interconnected and influenced by a larger sociotechnical system. By analyzing the interactions between technological advancements and social dynamics, this study isolates three primary categories of structural risk: antecedent structural causes, antecedent system causes, and deleterious feedback loops. We present a comprehensive framework to understand the causal chains that drive these risks, highlighting the interdependence between structural forces and the more proximate risks of misuse and system failures. The paper articulates how unchecked AI advancement can reshape power dynamics, trust, and incentive structures, leading to profound and often unpredictable shifts. We introduce a methodological research agenda for mapping, simulating, and gaming these dynamics aimed at preparing policymakers and national security officials for the challenges posed by next-generation AI technologies. The paper concludes with policy recommendations.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the structural risks brought about by the rapid integration of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in social, economic and political systems. Specifically, the author challenges the view that has traditionally focused mainly on direct threats (such as accidents and misuse), and proposes that these more direct risks are actually influenced and driven by larger sociotechnical dynamics. By analyzing the complex interactions between technological progress and social dynamics, the paper identifies three main categories of structural risks:

1. **Antecedent Structural Causes**: These factors originate from the existing structures of social and technological systems, such as the transparency norms of the open - source code ecosystem regarding the proliferation of AI systems, and the long - term changes in human decision - making processes due to the introduction of AI technology.

2. **Antecedent AI System Causes**: This involves risks arising from the characteristics of AI systems themselves, such as how social media algorithms change public opinion and exacerbate political polarization, or how advanced AI systems lower the technological threshold for designing biological and chemical weapons.

3. **Deleterious Feedback Loops**: This refers to the vicious cycles formed within complex sociotechnical systems, for example, the competitive dynamics among countries vying for AI superiority, which may lead countries to accelerate the deployment of AI models that have not been fully tested, thereby affecting the offense - defense balance.

To better understand and address these structural risks, the paper proposes a comprehensive framework for analyzing the causal chains that drive these risks, and emphasizes the interdependence between structural forces and more direct risks (such as misuse, system failures, and the proliferation of inconsistent systems). In addition, the article also suggests a research agenda for mapping, simulating, and gaming these dynamics to help policymakers and national security professionals prepare for the challenges brought by the next - generation AI technology. Finally, the paper calls for a more nuanced understanding of the sociotechnical intersection to be incorporated into international governance and strategy to ensure the safety and controllability of future AI development.