Abstract:Critics currently argue that applied ethics approaches to artificial intelligence (AI) are too principles-oriented and entail a theory-practice gap. Several applied ethical approaches try to prevent such a gap by conceptually translating ethical theory into practice. In this article, we explore how the currently most prominent approaches of AI ethics translate ethics into practice. Therefore, we examine three approaches to applied AI ethics: the embedded ethics approach, the ethically aligned approach, and the Value Sensitive Design (VSD) approach. We analyze each of these three approaches by asking how they understand and conceptualize theory and practice. We outline the conceptual strengths as well as their shortcomings: an embedded ethics approach is context-oriented but risks being biased by it; ethically aligned approaches are principles-oriented but lack justification theories to deal with trade-offs between competing principles; and the interdisciplinary Value Sensitive Design approach is based on stakeholder values but needs linkage to political, legal, or social governance aspects. Against this background, we develop a meta-framework for applied AI ethics conceptions with three dimensions. Based on critical theory, we suggest these dimensions as starting points to critically reflect on the conceptualization of theory and practice. We claim, first, that the inclusion of the dimension of affects and emotions in the ethical decision-making process stimulates reflections on vulnerabilities, experiences of disregard, and marginalization already within the AI development process. Second, we derive from our analysis that considering the dimension of justifying normative background theories provides both standards and criteria as well as guidance for prioritizing or evaluating competing principles in cases of conflict. Third, we argue that reflecting the governance dimension in ethical decision-making is an important factor to reveal power structures as well as to realize ethical AI and its application because this dimension seeks to combine social, legal, technical, and political concerns. This meta-framework can thus serve as a reflective tool for understanding, mapping, and assessing the theory-practice conceptualizations within AI ethics approaches to address and overcome their blind spots.

An embedded ethics approach for AI development

Ethics in the Age of AI: Research of the Intersection of Technology, Morality, and Society

An Ecosystem Approach to Ethical AI and Data Use: Experimental Reflections

An Ethical Framework for Guiding the Development of Affectively-Aware Artificial Intelligence

[Deep healing-Comments on the ethical risks and chances of artificial intelligence]

Navigating and reviewing ethical dilemmas in AI development: Strategies for transparency, fairness, and accountability

The Ethics of AI: Navigating the Moral Dilemmas of Artificial Intelligence

Ethics as a service: a pragmatic operationalisation of AI Ethics

From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices

AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers

The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Ethical Considerations Surrounding the Development and Use of AI

Machine Ethics: The Creation of a Virtuous Machine

Organisational responses to the ethical issues of artificial intelligence

Why we need to focus on developing ethical, responsible, and trustworthy artificial intelligence approaches for environmental science

Implementing Ethics in AI: Initial Results of an Industrial Multiple Case Study

Beyond Bias and Compliance: Towards Individual Agency and Plurality of Ethics in AI

Ethical Considerations in AI-Powered Work Environments: A Literature Review and Theoretical Framework for Ensuring Human Dignity and Fairness

Politics by Automatic Means? A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Ethics at Work

Reflections on Putting AI Ethics into Practice: How Three AI Ethics Approaches Conceptualize Theory and Practice

Educating AI developers to prevent harmful path dependency in AI resort-to-force decision making

Operationalising AI ethics through the agile software development lifecycle: a case study of AI-enabled mobile health applications