Monte Carlo simulations and radiation dosimetry measurements of 142Pr capillary tube-based radioactive implant (CTRI): a new structure for brachytherapy sources

Mohamadreza K Bakht,Mahdi Sadeghi,Seyed J Ahmadi,Asghar Haddadi,Soudeh S Sadjadi,Claudio Tenreiro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0683-y
Abstract:Objective: Previously, a promising β(-)-emitting praseodymium-142 glass seed was proposed for brachytherapy of prostate cancer. In accordance with the previous study, a (142)Pr capillary tube-based radioactive implant (CTRI) was suggested as a source with a new structure to enhance application of β(-)-emitting radioisotopes such as (142)Pr in brachytherapy. Methods: Praseodymium oxide powder was encapsulated in a glass capillary tube. Then, a thin and flexible fluorinated ethylene propylene Teflon(®) layer sealed the capillary tube. The source was activated in the Tehran Research Reactor by the (141)Pr(n,γ) (142)Pr reaction. Measurements of the dosimetric parameters were performed using GafChromic(®) radiochromic film. In addition, the dose rate distribution of (142)Pr CTRI was calculated by modeling (142)Pr source in a water phantom using Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport (MCNP5) Code. Results: The active source was unreactive and did not leak in water. In comparison with the earlier proposed (142)Pr seed, the suggested source showed similar desirable dosimetric characteristics. Moreover, the (142)Pr CTRI production procedure may be technically and economically more feasible. The mass of praseodymium in CTRI structure could be greater than that of the (142)Pr glass seed; therefore, the required irradiation time and the neutron flux could be reduced. Conclusion: A (142)Pr CTRI was proposed for brachytherapy of prostate cancer. The dosimetric calculations by the experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulation were performed to fulfill the requirements according to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine recommendations before the clinical use of new brachytherapy sources. The characteristics of the suggested source were compared with those of the previously proposed (142)Pr glass seed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?