Abstract:Ton-scale liquid xenon detectors operated in two-phase mode are proposed and being constructed recently to explore the favored parameter space for the Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) dark matter. To achieve a better light collection efficiency while limiting the number of electronics channels compared to the previous generation detectors, large-size photo-multiplier tubes (PMTs) such as the 3-inch-diameter R11410 from Hamamatsu are suggested to replace the 1-inch-square R8520 PMTs. In a two-phase xenon dark matter detector, two PMT arrays on the top and bottom are usually used. In this study, we compare the performance of two different ton-scale liquid xenon detector configurations with the same number of either R11410 (config.1) or R8520 (config.2) for the top PMT array, while both using R11410 PMTs for the bottom array. The self-shielding of liquid xenon suppresses the background from the PMTs and the dominant background is from the pp solar neutrinos in the central fiducial volume. The light collection efficiency for the primary scintillation light is largely affected by the xenon purity and the reflectivity of the reflectors. In the optimistic situation with a 10 m light absorption length and a 95% reflectivity, the light collection efficiency is 43%(34%) for config.1(config.2). In the conservative situation with a 2.5 m light absorption length and a 85% reflectivity, the value is only 18%(13%) for config.1(config.2). The difference between the two configurations is due to the larger PMT coverage on the top for config.1. The slightly different position resolutions for the two configurations have a negligible effect on the sensitivity. Based on the above considerations, we estimate the sensitivity reach of the two detector configurations. Both configurations can reach a sensitivity of 2 similar to 3x10(-47)cm(2) for spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section for 100 GeV/c(2) WIMPs after two live-years of operation. The one with R8520 PMTs for the top PMT array is more cost-effective, while the one with R11410 PMTs on the top has a factor of two better sensitivity for light WIMPs at 10GeV/c(2).

Why would you put a flashlight in a dark matter detector?

Why would you put a flashlight in a dark matter detector?

Challenges for dark matter direct search with SiPMs

Characterisation of Silicon Photomultipliers for liquid xenon detectors

Detection of liquid xenon scintillation light with a Silicon Photomultiplier

SiPM Cross-Talk in Liquid Argon Detectors

Study of Silicon Photomultiplier external cross-talk

Initial Evaluation of Proportional Scintillation in Liquid Xenon for Direct Dark Matter Detection

Reflectivity of VUV-sensitive Silicon Photomultipliers in Liquid Xenon

A novel measurement method for SiPM external crosstalk probability at low temperature

Characterisation of SiPM Photon Emission in the Dark

Feasibility of Liquid-phase Xenon Proportional Scintillation for Low-energy Physics

On Dark Matter Detector Concepts with Large-Area Cryogenic Gaseous Photo Multipliers

VUV-Sensitive Silicon Photomultipliers for Xenon Scintillation Light Detection in nEXO

Study of light detection and sensitivity for a ton-scale liquid xenon dark matter detector

A Digital Silicon Photomultiplier

Stimulated Secondary Emission of Single Photon Avalanche Diodes

Optical crosstalk photon penetration depth in Silicon Photomultipliers

SBC-SNOLAB scintillation system and SiPM implementation for dark matter searches