2022 Nobel Prize in Physics and the End of Mechanistic Materialism

Igor Salom

2023-11-18

Abstract:The ideas and results that are in the background of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics had an immense impact on our understanding of reality. Therefore, it is crucial that these implications reach also the general public, not only the scientists in the related fields of quantum mechanics. The purpose of this review is to attempt to elucidate these revolutionary changes in our worldview that were eventually acknowledged also by the Nobel's committee, and to do it with very few references to mathematical details (which could be even ignored without undermining the take-away essence of the text). We first look into the foundational disputes between Einstein and Bohr about the nature of quantum mechanics, which culminated in the so-called EPR paradox -- the main impetus for all the research that would ensue in this context. Next, we try to explain the statement of the famous Bell's theorem -- the theorem that relocated the Einstain-Bohr discussions from the realm of philosophy and metaphysics to hard-core physics verifiable by experiments (we also give a brief derivation of the theorem's proof). Then we overview the experimental work of the last year's laureates, that had the final say about who was right in the debate. The outcome of these experiments forced us to profoundly revise our understanding of the universe. Finally, we discuss in more detail the implications of such outcomes, and what are the possible ways that our worldviews can be modified to account for the experimental facts. As we will see, the standard mechanist picture of the universe is no longer a viable option, and can be never again. Nowadays, we know this with certainty unusual for physics, that only a strict mathematical theorem could provide.

General Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of exploring the revolutionary impact of quantum mechanics on the understanding of reality by reviewing the background of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics and popularizing these important scientific achievements to the public. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **The Debate Between Einstein and Bohr on the Nature of Quantum Mechanics**: The paper provides a detailed introduction to the debate between Einstein and Bohr in the early 20th century regarding the nature of quantum mechanics, particularly the famous EPR paradox (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox). This paradox raised the question of whether quantum mechanics is a complete theory, leading to a significant amount of subsequent research.

2. **Bell's Theorem and Its Experimental Verification**: The paper explains the content and significance of Bell's theorem, which shifted the debate between Einstein and Bohr from the realms of philosophy and metaphysics to hardcore physics that can be experimentally verified. The paper also outlines the experimental work of last year's Nobel laureates (Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger), whose experiments ultimately demonstrated the violation of Bell's inequalities, thereby confirming the existence of quantum entanglement.

3. **Impact of Experimental Results on the Understanding of Reality**: The paper discusses how these experimental results force us to re-examine our fundamental understanding of the universe. In particular, the standard mechanistic materialist worldview is no longer tenable, and we need new ways to explain the experimental facts.

4. **Philosophical Implications for the Concept of Reality**: The paper further explores the profound philosophical implications of these scientific achievements on the concept of reality, including the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, and the importance of the observer's role.

In summary, the paper aims to convey to the public the scientific breakthroughs represented by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics and their profound impact on the understanding of reality, emphasizing that these achievements are significant not only for scientists but also for the worldview of ordinary people.