Abstract:Bell inequalities were created with the goal of improving the understanding of foundational questions in quantum mechanics. To this end, they are typically applied to measurement results generated from entangled systems of particles. They can, however, also be used as a statistical tool for macroscopic systems, where they can describe the connection strength between two components of a system under a causal model. We show that, in principle, data from macroscopic observations analyzed with Bell’ s approach can invalidate certain causal models. To illustrate this use, we describe a macroscopic game setting, without a quantum mechanical measurement process, and analyze it using the framework of Bell experiments. In the macroscopic game, violations of the inequalities can be created by cheating with classically defined strategies. In the physical context, the meaning of violations is less clear and is still vigorously debated. We discuss two measures for optimal strategies to generate a given statistic that violates the inequalities. We show their mathematical equivalence and how they can be computed from CHSH-quantities alone, if non-signaling applies. As a macroscopic example from the financial world, we show how the unfair use of insider knowledge could be picked up using Bell statistics. Finally, in the discussion of realist interpretations of quantum mechanical Bell experiments, cheating strategies are often expressed through the ideas of free choice and locality. In this regard, violations of free choice and locality can be interpreted as two sides of the same coin, which underscores the view that the meaning these terms are given in Bell’s approach should not be confused with their everyday use. In general, we conclude that Bell’s approach also carries lessons for understanding macroscopic systems of which the connectedness conforms to different causal structures.

The Bell experiment; an epistemological approach

What Bell Did

After Bell

Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality

Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities: A first-hand account by Alain Aspect

Violation of Bell's Inequality in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Form with Entangled Quantum States Revisited

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell

John Bell and the Nature of the Quantum World

Bell inequalities: many questions, a few answers

Quantifying and Interpreting Connection Strength in Macro- and Microscopic Systems: Lessons from Bell’s Approach

Bell's Experiment in Quantum Mechanics and Classical Physics

Eberhardt's inequality and recent loophole-free experiments

Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography

J.S. Bell's Concept of Local Causality

Bell's inequality and the spooky actions at a distance

Bell's Theorem Begs the Question