Abstract:Bell inequalities were created with the goal of improving the understanding of foundational questions in quantum mechanics. To this end, they are typically applied to measurement results generated from entangled systems of particles. They can, however, also be used as a statistical tool for macroscopic systems, where they can describe the connection strength between two components of a system under a causal model. We show that, in principle, data from macroscopic observations analyzed with Bell’ s approach can invalidate certain causal models. To illustrate this use, we describe a macroscopic game setting, without a quantum mechanical measurement process, and analyze it using the framework of Bell experiments. In the macroscopic game, violations of the inequalities can be created by cheating with classically defined strategies. In the physical context, the meaning of violations is less clear and is still vigorously debated. We discuss two measures for optimal strategies to generate a given statistic that violates the inequalities. We show their mathematical equivalence and how they can be computed from CHSH-quantities alone, if non-signaling applies. As a macroscopic example from the financial world, we show how the unfair use of insider knowledge could be picked up using Bell statistics. Finally, in the discussion of realist interpretations of quantum mechanical Bell experiments, cheating strategies are often expressed through the ideas of free choice and locality. In this regard, violations of free choice and locality can be interpreted as two sides of the same coin, which underscores the view that the meaning these terms are given in Bell’s approach should not be confused with their everyday use. In general, we conclude that Bell’s approach also carries lessons for understanding macroscopic systems of which the connectedness conforms to different causal structures.

Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography

The Effects of Free Will on Randomness Expansion.

Violation of Local Realism with Freedom of Choice.

Effects of Reduced Measurement Independence on Bell-Based Randomness Expansion

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

Quantum Cryptography Based On Bell Theorem

Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality

Experimental certification of more than one bit of quantum randomness in the two inputs and two outputs scenario

Violation of Bell's Inequality in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Form with Entangled Quantum States Revisited

Kolmogorovian Censorship, Predictive Incompleteness, and the locality loophole in Bell experiments

Quantifying and Interpreting Connection Strength in Macro- and Microscopic Systems: Lessons from Bell’s Approach

Bell's Experiment in Quantum Mechanics and Classical Physics

Bell's Inequalities and Quantum Communication Complexity.

Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...

After Bell

Against Bell's Theorem

Bell inequalities as a tool to probe quantum chaos

Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality

Security and Composability of Randomness Expansion from Bell Inequalities

Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell's theorem

Robust Bell inequalities from communication complexity