Abstract:Bell’s inequality is derived by resorting to a hidden-variable theory devised for resolving the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. The legitimacy of quantum superposition for describing the physical world is the essence of the debate. Einstein argued against the legitimacy of quantum superposition. Testing Bell’s inequality by experiments with the experimental results explained by Bell’s theorem opened the door to so-called quantum information technologies. In quantum information theory, “quantum bit” (or “qubit” for short) in a form of quantum superposition is supposed to represent quantum information. In the present paper, a new principle, the general principle of measurements, is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, the experiments for testing Bell’s inequality and so-called experimental evidence for physically realizable “qubit” are scrutinized. The findings are as follows. Although most physicists believe that Einstein’s vision of the physical world contradicts the experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality, actually Einstein’s viewpoint is irrelevant to Bell’s theorem. Bell’s inequality failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate. The experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality and the measurement outcomes of various experiments involving “qubit” are all erroneously explained. Without involving hidden variables, quantum mechanics can be completed based on the general principle of measurements by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space, and the mathematical setting can remain essentially unchanged. All kinds of “qubit” violate the general principle of measurements and can only describe imaginary objects that do not exist in the real world. A very regrettable conclusion from the above findings is inevitable: Quantum information has no physical carriers, and all quantum information technologies are not physically realizable.

Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Experimental Measurement-Dependent Local Bell Test with Human Free Will

Against Bell's Theorem

Test of transient deviations from Quantum Mechanics in Bell's experiment

A simple test of local realistic hidden-variable theories without inequalities

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

Testing for Multipartite Quantum Nonlocality Using Functional Bell Inequalities.

After Bell

Bell's nonlocality in a general nonsignaling case: quantitatively and conceptually

Violation of Local Realism with Freedom of Choice.

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

Robust self-testing of Bell inequalities tilted for maximal loophole-free nonlocality

A possible statistics loophole in Bell's theorem

Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism

New Bell inequality for the optical test of local hidden-variables model

Bell's inequality violation due to misidentification of spatially non stationary random processes

Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...

Loophole-free Bell tests with randomly chosen subsets of measurement settings

Entangled Baryons: Violation of Inequalities Based on Local Realism Assuming Dependence of Decays on Hidden Variables

On Purported Physical Realizations of So-called Quantum Information Technologies